linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
To: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: liub.liubo@gmail.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Btrfs: fix deadlock between sys_sync and freeze
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:12:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <502A5CDA.2080806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502A5849.9040602@oracle.com>

Il 14/08/2012 15:53, Liu Bo ha scritto:
> On 08/14/2012 08:59 PM, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>> Il 14/08/2012 07:01, liub.liubo@gmail.com ha scritto:
>>> From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
>>>
>>> I found this while testing xfstests 068, the story is
>>>
>>>       t1                                            t2
>>>     sys_sync                                    thaw_super
>>>       iterate_supers
>>>         down_read(sb->s_umount)                   down_write(sb->s_umount) --->wait for t1
>>>         sync_fs (with wait mode)
>>>           start_transaction
>>>             sb_start_intwrite --------------------> wait for t2 to set s_writers.frozen to SB_UNFROZEN
>>>
>>> In this patch, I add an helper sb_start_intwrite_trylock() and use it before we
>>> start_transaction in sync_fs() with wait mode so that we won't hit the deadlock.
>>>
>>
>> IMHO, we should avoid to call the sync operation on a frozen fs. The freeze operation, indeed, already include a sync operation.
>> According to man page, no other operation should modify the fs after the freeze.
>> So for me the modification is inside sync_filesystem (and sync_one_sb).
>
> Do you mean that we should add the trylock check in sync_filesystem?
>
> But it seems to be useless because we already run into down_read(sb->s_umount) before starting sync_one_sb().
>
> thanks,
> liubo
>

I meant that we should check if there are in a "complete" freeze state 
(according to the "states" of a freeze transaction) and simply skip the 
sync operation.

Marco

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-14 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-14  5:01 [PATCH RFC] Btrfs: fix deadlock between sys_sync and freeze liub.liubo
2012-08-14 12:59 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-08-14 13:53   ` Liu Bo
2012-08-14 14:12     ` Marco Stornelli [this message]
2012-08-15 12:51       ` Liu Bo
2012-08-15 13:12         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=502A5CDA.2080806@gmail.com \
    --to=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liub.liubo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).