From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from csamuel.org ([74.50.50.137]:56331 "EHLO csamuel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755167Ab2HUBVo (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:21:44 -0400 Message-ID: <5032E297.3050006@csamuel.org> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:21:27 +1000 From: Chris Samuel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Curtis Jones CC: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: btrfs and mdadm raid 6 References: <8AE790DA-04B5-4407-A5FE-D0AC4560B415@gmail.com> <20120820230603.1ba1afca@natsu> <2D811613-9EF6-4C5E-84A3-CB0E8D425B0B@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2D811613-9EF6-4C5E-84A3-CB0E8D425B0B@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21/08/12 08:24, Curtis Jones wrote: > You mentioned that btrfs was going to set aside a ton of space > for metadata. Is that entirely due to going ext4 -> btrfs? No, I believe that's a regression in btrfs in recent kernels.. -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC