* [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix wrong return value of check_owner_ref()
@ 2012-08-29 5:27 Miao Xie
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Miao Xie @ 2012-08-29 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Btrfs
If we find the block by seach corresponding fs tree, we should return 0,
and tell the caller we pass the check. Or btrfsck will fail to read the
fs/file tree and report many error message by mistake.
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Several days ago, I sent this patch as a reply. Now I send it as a independent
patch mail.
---
btrfsck.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfsck.c b/btrfsck.c
index 4e91769..57e7b57 100644
--- a/btrfsck.c
+++ b/btrfsck.c
@@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ static int check_owner_ref(struct btrfs_root *root,
if (buf->start == btrfs_node_blockptr(path.nodes[level + 1],
path.slots[level + 1]))
- rec->owner_ref_checked = 1;
+ found = 1;
btrfs_release_path(ref_root, &path);
return found ? 0 : 1;
--
1.7.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-08-29 6:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-29 5:27 [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fix wrong return value of check_owner_ref() Miao Xie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).