From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:14691 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757475Ab2IFKos (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2012 06:44:48 -0400 Received: from fnstmail02.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com (tang.cn.fujitsu.com [127.0.0.1]) by tang.cn.fujitsu.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q86A2LSo017560 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 18:02:24 +0800 Message-ID: <504874A1.5000500@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:02:09 +0800 From: Miao Xie Reply-To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Btrfs Subject: [PATCH V4 05/12] Btrfs: fix wrong orphan count of the fs/file tree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: In-Reply-To: <50487434.1010305@cn.fujitsu.com> If we add a new orphan item, we should increase the atomic counter, not decrease it. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie --- Changelog v1 -> v4: - No change. --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 6ba80b9..e954737 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -2224,7 +2224,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode) insert = 1; #endif insert = 1; - atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes); + atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes); } if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED, -- 1.7.6.5