From: Wade Cline <clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Btrfs-progs: Fix compiler warnings on PPC64.
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:13:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <505365A9.2080900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120914135919.GN17430@twin.jikos.cz>
On 09/14/2012 06:59 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:21:56PM -0700, clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>> Defining __KERNEL__ before the file<asm/types.h>, or any file that
>> includes this file, will let PPC64 know to use unsigned long long
>> for u64 instead. This patch adds the defines and fixes the print
>> warnings on PPC64.
> Defining __KERNEL__ in random places does not seem clean, I understand
> it in kerncompat.h which should transparently fix any compatibility
> issues, and the files like cmd-receive.c should include this instead of
> the explicit defines.
>
>
> david
>
I agree that defining __KERNEL__ does not seem clean, but the problem is
that
the various include files sort of "race" to include the type definition.
For example,
in cmds-scrub.c:
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#define __KERNEL__
#include <sys/stat.h>
will generate compiler warnings while:
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#define __KERNEL__
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
will not. By the time kerncompat.h is included, u64 is almost always
defined to
the non-compatible value. So either kerncompat.h needs to be defined as
the -first-
included header file, or __KERNEL__ needs to be defined.
...it would also be possible to do something like:
#define __KERNEL__
#include <sys/wait.h>
#undef __KERNEL__
but that seems a bit too hacky.
I'm open to any other ideas, though.
Thank you,
Wade
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-14 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 23:21 [RFC][PATCH] Btrfs-progs: Fix compiler warnings on PPC64 clinew
2012-09-14 13:59 ` David Sterba
2012-09-14 17:13 ` Wade Cline [this message]
2012-09-20 14:15 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=505365A9.2080900@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).