From: Wade Cline <clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [e2fsprogs] ext2_dir_entry To ext2_dir_entry_2 Casting
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:29:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506C8426.4010008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121003175831.GC4237@thunk.org>
On 10/03/2012 10:58 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> To clarify, the EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE flag indicates that
> there _may_ be file type information in the directory entry (and so
> only the low 8 bits of name_len should be considered part of the name
> length), but it does not guarantee that it will be present in the high
> 8 bits of name_len.
>
> If it is not there, then readdir will simply return DT_UNKNOWN in the
> d_type field of the directory entry returned by readdir(2). This is
> something all application programs have to be prepared to deal with
> --- if they need the file type information, and they get DT_UNKNOWN,
> then they will need to stat the file to get the information.
>
> - Ted
>
In this case, dir_iterate_proc() is being passed into
ext2_dir_iterate2() and is called from ext2fs_process_dir_block(),
not readdir(2). It looks like the main issue would be detecting if the
EXT2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE flag is -unset- and manually
setting the file type to EXT2_FT_UNKNOWN (there appears to be a case for
handling EXT2_FT_UNKNOWN; so long as the file type is not set to an
undefined value it should be okay).
Thank you for the clarification.
Regards,
Wade
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <506B31B7.40405@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-10-02 19:02 ` [e2fsprogs] ext2_dir_entry To ext2_dir_entry_2 Casting Wade Cline
2012-10-02 21:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-03 17:39 ` Wade Cline
2012-10-03 17:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-03 18:29 ` Wade Cline [this message]
2012-10-03 18:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506C8426.4010008@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=clinew@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).