From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@gmail.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Chris Mason" <chris.mason@fusionio.com>,
"Hugo Mills" <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
"Roman Mamedov" <rm@romanrm.ru>,
"Sébastien Maury" <sebastien.maury@inserm.fr>,
"Ilya Dryomov" <idryomov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][V3] btrfs filesystem df
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 15:47:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50703676.20608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201210061157.03992.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
On 10/06/2012 11:57 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>
>
> Works nicely here:
>
> merkaba:/home/[…]> ./btrfs fi df /
> Path: /
> Summary:
> Disk_size: 18.62GB
> Disk_allocated: 18.62GB
> Disk_unallocated: 0.00
> Logical_size: 16.87GB
> Used: 12.46GB
> Free_(Estimated): 4.41GB (Max: 4.41GB, Min: 4.41GB)
> Data_to_disk_ratio: 91 %
>
> Details:
> Chunk_type Mode Size_(disk) Size_(logical) Used
> Data Single 15.10GB 15.10GB 11.78GB
> System DUP 16.00MB 8.00MB 4.00KB
> System Single 4.00MB 4.00MB 0.00
> Metadata DUP 3.50GB 1.75GB 693.97MB
> Metadata Single 8.00MB 8.00MB 0.00
>
>
> merkaba:/home/[…]> ./btrfs fi df /mnt/amazon
> Path: /mnt/amazon
> Summary:
> Disk_size: 465.76GB
> Disk_allocated: 465.76GB
> Disk_unallocated: 4.00KB
> Logical_size: 455.75GB
> Used: 368.83GB
> Free_(Estimated): 86.93GB (Max: 86.93GB, Min: 86.93GB)
> Data_to_disk_ratio: 98 %
>
> Details:
> Chunk_type Mode Size_(disk) Size_(logical) Used
> Data Single 445.73GB 445.73GB 368.24GB
> System DUP 16.00MB 8.00MB 64.00KB
> System Single 4.00MB 4.00MB 0.00
> Metadata DUP 20.00GB 10.00GB 598.84MB
> Metadata Single 8.00MB 8.00MB 0.00
>
>
> I wonder about free size estimation minimum and maximum are the same tough.
>
> Do you have a explaination for this?
Yes, the explanation is quite simple: the unallocated sector are zero;
all the disks are mapped in the chunk. So the allocation policy is
stabilised and fixed. The free space is the sum of the free space of the
metadata and the free space of the data (445.73-368.24 + 10-0.598 = ~86GB).
If some disk areas had un-allocated sectors, depending by the
destination them would be DUPlicated or Single. This lead to have not
*one* "free value" but a range.
In your case there is no choice because there is no allocation area
available anymore.
>
> Otherwise:
>
> Tested-By: Martin Steigerwald<martin@lichtvoll.de>
>
> (as of commit c3f7fa95f3aa29972b79eed71ec063b6a3019017 from your repo.)
>
>
> The data to disk ratio on bigger disk is lower due to less duplicated meta
> data involved, I bet. I want to recreate / anyway with 16 KiB leaf and node
> size and then I think I will use single for metadata as its an SSD. The
> bigger one is external eSATA harddisk.
>
>
> I can test and post outputs of a few other disks including my oldest BTRFS
> filesystems on a ThinkPad T23 which are at least one, possible almost 2
> years old. Is there are way to tell filesystem creation date? And a 2 TiB
> backup disk with three or for subvolumes and>10 snapshots of all of them
> together.
>
>> Where:
>> Disk_size -> sum of sizes of teh disks
>> Disk_allocated -> sum of chunk sizes
>> Disk_unallocated -> Disk_size - Disk_allocated
>> Logical_size -> sum of logical area sizes
>> Used -> logical area used
>> Free_(Estimated) -> on the basis of allocated
>> chunk, an estrapolation of
>> the free space
>> Data_to_disk_ratio -> ration between the space occuped
>> by a chunk and the real space
>> available ( due to duplication
>> and/or RAID level)
>> Chunk_type -> kind of chunk
>> Mode -> allocation policy of a chunk
>> Size_(disk) -> area of disk(s) occuped by the
>> chunk (see it as raw space used)
>> Size_(logical) -> logical area size of the chunk
>> Used -> portion of the logical area
>> used by the filesystem
> […]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-06 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 17:27 [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][V3] btrfs filesystem df Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-04 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] Update btrfs filesystem df command Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-04 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Update help page Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-06 9:57 ` [PATCH][BTRFS-PROGS][V3] btrfs filesystem df Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-06 13:47 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2012-10-09 13:51 ` David Sterba
2012-10-09 18:07 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-09 22:15 ` David Sterba
2012-10-10 17:26 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50703676.20608@gmail.com \
--to=kreijack@gmail.com \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rm@romanrm.ru \
--cc=sebastien.maury@inserm.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).