From: "Swâmi Petaramesh" <swami@petaramesh.org>
To: "BTRFS, Linux" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: inode_cache
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:24:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507AA0E7.30706@petaramesh.org> (raw)
Hi there,
On a performance standpoint - and on Ubuntu Quantall kernel 3.5.0-17 -
is it advisable to mount BTRFS with "inode_cache" ?
Is there any risk or counterpart doing so ?
TIA, kind regards.
--
Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E
Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-14 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-14 11:24 Swâmi Petaramesh [this message]
2012-10-24 9:58 ` inode_cache Alex Lyakas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507AA0E7.30706@petaramesh.org \
--to=swami@petaramesh.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).