From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc by multi-task
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:53:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50892821.5010808@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5089045D.8050801@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 10/25/2012 05:20 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
> This patchset introduce multi-task delalloc flush, it can make the delalloc
> flush more faster. And besides that, it also can fix the problem that we join
> the same transaction handler more than 2 times.
>
> Implementation:
> - Create a new worker pool.
> - Queue the inode with pending delalloc into the work queue of the worker pool
> when we want to force them into the disk, and then we will wait till all the
> works we submit are done.
> - The ordered extents also can be queued into this work queue. The process is
> similar to the second one.
>
I can see the potential improvements brought by flushing inodes this way.
But I don't think it makes much sense by making waiting process multi-task,
since even we spread wait order extents into different cpus, they just occpied
the cpu and went on waiting and scheduled then, I mean, the bottleneck is on
what we're waiting for.
Besides, considering that this patchset is about to getting us better performance,
I'm expecting any performance numbers (I'm a little worried about context switches
overhead).
btw, cool ideas indeed.
thanks,
liubo
> Miao Xie (3):
> Btrfs: make delalloc inodes be flushed by multi-task
> Btrfs: make ordered operations be handled by multi-task
> Btrfs: make ordered extent be flushed by multi-task
>
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 14 +++++++
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 7 ++++
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 7 +++-
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 6 +++-
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 24 ++++++++++---
> 7 files changed, 185 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-25 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 9:20 [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc by multi-task Miao Xie
2012-10-25 9:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] Btrfs: make delalloc inodes be flushed " Miao Xie
2012-10-25 9:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] Btrfs: make ordered operations be handled " Miao Xie
2012-10-25 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] Btrfs: make ordered extent be flushed " Miao Xie
2012-10-25 11:53 ` Liu Bo [this message]
2012-10-26 1:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] flush delalloc " Miao Xie
2012-10-26 2:05 ` Liu Bo
2012-10-26 3:25 ` Miao Xie
2012-10-26 7:01 ` Liu Bo
2012-11-01 7:43 ` Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50892821.5010808@oracle.com \
--to=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).