From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>,
"Chris Murphy" <lists@colorremedies.com>,
"Hugo Mills" <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
"Michael Kjörling" <michael@kjorling.se>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df"
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:58:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508D0FC5.1020404@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201210281133.10571.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
On 2012-10-28 11:33, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 28. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
[...]
>> $ sudo ./btrfs fi df /mnt/btrfs1/
>> Path: /mnt/btrfs1
>> Summary:
>> Disk_size: 21.00GB
>> Disk_allocated: 1.83GB
>> Disk_unallocated: 19.17GB
>> Used: 284.00KB
>> Free_(Estimated): 15.76GB (Max: 20.54GB, min: 10.96GB)
>> Data_to_disk_ratio: 75 %
>
> Okay, so that btrfs fi df.
>
> Which is a summary.
>
> I think much more wouldn´t be a summary anymore, so thats okay.
>
>
> And the following
>
>> Allocated_area:
>> Data,Single: Size:8.00MB, Used:0.00
>> /dev/vdb 8.00MB
>>
>> Data,RAID0: Size:921.75MB, Used:256.00KB
>> /dev/vdb 307.25MB
[...]
>
> is detail shown by btrfs filesystem disk-usage?
Yes
>
> While
>
>> Disks:
>> /dev/vdb 3.00GB
>> Data,Single: 8.00MB
>> Data,RAID0: 307.25MB
>> Metadata,Single: 8.00MB
>> Metadata,RAID1: 460.94MB
[...]
>
> will be btrfs device disk-usage?
yes
>
> What was your reasoning for not using options to btrfs filesystem df? That
> df doesn´t show more than "disk free" as well?
My feel is that a switch should change "a bit" a command. In this case
there are very different outputs, for different purposes (how is used a
disk ? where are the chunks ? how many free space I have ? ).
>
> Then there is a little "inconsistency": "df" versus "disk-usage". I would
> use either "disk-free" and "disk-usage" or "df" and "du". While regular
> "du" is not disk-usage but a filesystem directory tree usage command.
>
> I will think about this a bit more.
>
> Thanks,
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 19:21 [RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df" Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-25 19:40 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 19:59 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-25 20:06 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 20:36 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-25 20:49 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 20:52 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-25 20:03 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-25 20:11 ` cwillu
2012-10-25 20:41 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-26 2:33 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-26 3:36 ` cwillu
2012-10-26 4:03 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-27 15:05 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-27 16:43 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-27 19:55 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-27 22:30 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-27 22:38 ` Hugo Mills
2012-10-27 23:01 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 10:58 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 8:45 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 10:38 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 10:59 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 11:18 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 12:25 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 12:48 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 13:22 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-27 23:35 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 11:20 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 9:01 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-28 10:33 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 10:58 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2012-10-28 11:16 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-28 18:27 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 19:06 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 19:42 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 20:09 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-28 20:19 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-29 9:04 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-30 4:41 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-28 19:42 ` Chris Murphy
2012-10-29 13:06 ` Randy Barlow
2012-10-29 22:21 ` [RFC][V2] " Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-30 9:42 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-30 18:15 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-30 18:32 ` Michael Kjörling
2012-10-30 20:13 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508D0FC5.1020404@inwind.it \
--to=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=michael@kjorling.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox