From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:44983 "EHLO relay3-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752831Ab2LCMZE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:25:04 -0500 Message-ID: <50BC9A1A.9030204@petaramesh.org> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 13:24:58 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sw=E2mi_Petaramesh?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hugo Mills , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Example of BTRFS uglyssima performance : Bitcoin References: <50BC92F6.6050404@petaramesh.org> <20121203120952.GE7289@carfax.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121203120952.GE7289@carfax.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le 03/12/2012 13:09, Hugo Mills a écrit : > Try 3.7. That's had some significant performance improvements. 3.5 is > over 6 months old, which is a long time in btrfs development. I understand the suggestion from a developper's PoV, but from a user's that's much too much hassle living ahead of one's distro's kernel, or using "vanilla" ones. Been there, done that. No more suffering for me please ;-)) I'll have to stick with current Ubuntu kernel, or at least with a future backport... Kind regards. -- Swâmi Petaramesh http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.