From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:63249 "EHLO mail-bk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754150Ab3ARRbq (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:31:46 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w11so2139187bku.3 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:31:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50F9871A.90307@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:32:10 +0100 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Mason , David Sterba , Chris Mason , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] btrfs-progs: more bugfixes for 0.20-rc1 References: <20130117174721.GD22785@twin.jikos.cz> <20130117175159.GA30656@shiny.int.fusionio.com> In-Reply-To: <20130117175159.GA30656@shiny.int.fusionio.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Chris, On 01/17/2013 06:51 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47:21AM -0700, David Sterba wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> [...] > > Thanks Dave, pulling these in. what about my patches "Enhance the command btrfs filesystem df" (see my emails dated on 2012/11/02) [1] ? You stated an interesting in these patches; however then I never heard anything... Do you want I resubmit ? I reached a general consensus ( == nobody was too unsatisfied :-) ) about the wording and the format. And I have another question: it is possible to access to the RAID5/6 develop branch. I am interesting to check how my patches work with RAID5/6... > > -chris BR G.Baroncelli [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/21071 -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5