From: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:605!
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:53:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510B5845.2020602@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510B3B4B.6070607@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 2013/02/01 12:49, Miao Xie wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:31:33 +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2013/01/31 16:58, Miao Xie wrote:
>>> On wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:55:34 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> if you move the fail_block_groups: target above the comment, does that fix it?
>>>> (although I don't know yet what started IO . . . )
>>>>
>>>> like this:
>>>>
>>>> From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Make sure that we are always done with the btree_inode's mapping
>>>> before we shut down the worker threads in open_ctree() error
>>>> cases.
>>>
>>>
>>> I reviewed your patch again, and found it just fix the above problem, it still
>>> have similar problems which are not fixed.
>>>
>>> How about this one?
>>
>> Thanks Eric and Miao.
>> But I can not reproduce this problem, yet.
>> ('Btrfs: too many missing devices, writeable mount is not allowed' messages was
>> displayed, but not panic)
>> So, I can not test your patch, sorry.
>>
>> Can you please explain similar problems, Miao?
>
> Before missing device check, there are several places where we read the metadata,
> such as reading chunk tree root, btrfs_read_chunk_tree, those functions may fail
> after submit a bio. If we don't wait until the bio end, and just stop the workers,
> the same problem will happen.
>
> (invalidate_inode_pages2() will wait until the bio end, because it need lock the pages
> which are going to be invalidated, and the page is locked if it is under disk read IO)
I understood.
My reproducer is not reproduce this problem yet. But the following messages were
displayed when 'rmmod btrfs' command was executed.
[76378.723481] =============================================================================
[76378.723901] BUG btrfs_extent_buffer (Tainted: G B ): Objects remaining in btrfs_extent_buffer on kmem_cache_close()
[76378.724333] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[76378.724333]
[76378.724959] INFO: Slab 0xffffea00065c3280 objects=23 used=2 fp=0xffff8801970caac0 flags=0x8000000000004080
[76378.725391] Pid: 9156, comm: rmmod Tainted: G B 3.8.0-rc5 #1
[76378.725397] Call Trace:
[76378.725403] [<ffffffff8111bc23>] slab_err+0xb0/0xd2
I think that this message means there is a possibility that I/O did not end
normally.
and, after Miao's patch applied, this message is not displayed when rmmod was
executed.
So, Miao's patch seems to fix the problem for me.
Thanks,
Tsutomu
>
> Thanks
> Miao
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tsutomu
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>> index 0c31d07..d8fd711 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>> @@ -2728,13 +2728,13 @@ fail_cleaner:
>>> * kthreads
>>> */
>>> filemap_write_and_wait(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
>>> - invalidate_inode_pages2(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
>>>
>>> fail_block_groups:
>>> btrfs_free_block_groups(fs_info);
>>>
>>> fail_tree_roots:
>>> free_root_pointers(fs_info, 1);
>>> + invalidate_inode_pages2(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
>>>
>>> fail_sb_buffer:
>>> btrfs_stop_workers(&fs_info->generic_worker);
>>> @@ -2755,7 +2755,6 @@ fail_alloc:
>>> fail_iput:
>>> btrfs_mapping_tree_free(&fs_info->mapping_tree);
>>>
>>> - invalidate_inode_pages2(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
>>> iput(fs_info->btree_inode);
>>> fail_bdi:
>>> bdi_destroy(&fs_info->bdi);
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 3:37 [BUG] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:605! Tsutomu Itoh
2013-01-31 5:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-01-31 7:44 ` Miao Xie
2013-01-31 7:58 ` Miao Xie
2013-01-31 15:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-02-01 0:31 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2013-02-01 3:49 ` Miao Xie
2013-02-01 5:53 ` Tsutomu Itoh [this message]
2013-02-04 2:39 ` Miao Xie
2013-02-04 16:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-01-31 6:14 ` Miao Xie
2013-01-31 6:19 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-01-31 6:35 ` Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510B5845.2020602@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).