From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:58130 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752986Ab3B1Ofc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:35:32 -0500 Received: from mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.131]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC14172085 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:35:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]) by mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j08sW9pgIvAx for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:35:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (AMontpellier-256-1-187-75.w92-143.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.143.82.75]) (Authenticated sender: swami@petaramesh.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D4201720AF for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:35:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <512F6B30.1060409@petaramesh.org> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:35:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sw=E2mi_Petaramesh?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "BTRFS, Linux" Subject: Does defragmenting even work Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: BTW... I'm not even sure that "btrfs filesystem defrag " actually does anything... If I run "filefrag " afterwards, it typically shows the same number of fragments that it did prior to running defrag... I'm not sure about how it actually works and what I should expect... -- Swâmi Petaramesh http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.