linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: "Jérôme Poulin" <jeromepoulin@gmail.com>
Cc: russell@coker.com.au, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Debian 3.7.1 BTRFS crash
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:47:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5140837A.70409@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALJXSJqNermOKN7KZ_8x2SP0J8-f7F=tRiEMym6UWum7_Vf-4A@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/13/13 12:07 AM, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
>> [   37.176790] BTRFS error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_free_extent:5143: IO failure
>> [   37.176791] btrfs is forced readonly
>> [   37.176793] btrfs: run_one_delayed_ref returned -5
>>
> 
> 
> It seems the SSD has bad blocks now, BTRFS seems to abuse SSD disks, I
> burnt 1 SSD disk and 2 USB flash drive since I'm using BTRFS, in about
> 2 months for each. ddrescue'ing the SSD would probably give better
> chances of recovery and give BTRFS/btrfsck a chance to write correctly
> to the newly copied image.

On what do you base that theory?  I suppose it could be, but nothing
in the logs necessarily suggests that.  The "IO failure" is because 
the fs shut down, went readonly, and subsequent IOs got -EIO,
I think.

-Eric


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-13 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13  1:38 Debian 3.7.1 BTRFS crash Russell Coker
2013-03-13  1:56 ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-13  2:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13  5:07   ` Jérôme Poulin
2013-03-13 10:56     ` Bart Noordervliet
2013-03-13 11:31       ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-03-14 19:04         ` Norbert Scheibner
2013-03-14 23:17           ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-13 13:47     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-13 14:03       ` Russell Coker
2013-03-13 19:19         ` Chris Mason
2013-03-14  6:36           ` Russell Coker
2013-03-14 13:04             ` Chris Mason
2013-03-14  9:48     ` Martin Steigerwald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5140837A.70409@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeromepoulin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=russell@coker.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).