* [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl
2013-03-08 15:24 [PATCH 0/3 v2] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-08 15:24 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super Anand Jain
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-08 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace the parameter run_ioctl
which controls calling the function btrfs_register_one_device().
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
btrfsctl.c | 2 +-
cmds-device.c | 4 ++--
disk-io.c | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 3 ++-
utils.c | 17 +++++++++--------
utils.h | 7 ++++---
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfsctl.c b/btrfsctl.c
index 8fd8cc3..75bc52d 100644
--- a/btrfsctl.c
+++ b/btrfsctl.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
if (ac == 2 && strcmp(av[1], "-a") == 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
- btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
+ btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
exit(0);
}
for (i = 1; i < ac; i++) {
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 58df6da..1b8f378 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++ b/cmds-device.c
@@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ static int cmd_scan_dev(int argc, char **argv)
printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
if(checklist)
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
else
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret){
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: error %d while scanning\n", ret);
return 18;
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 897d0cf..5197456 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -833,7 +833,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
}
if (total_devs != 1) {
- ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index 20ff972..234daf4 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
}
if (total_devs != 1) {
- ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 1813dda..feee572 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -840,7 +840,8 @@ int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
/* scan other devices */
if (is_btrfs && total_devs > 1) {
- if((ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices_mnt, total_devs, 1)))
+ if((ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices_mnt, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER)))
return ret;
}
@@ -951,7 +952,7 @@ void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname)
close(fd);
}
-int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl)
+int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, u64 flags)
{
DIR *dirp = NULL;
struct dirent *dirent;
@@ -1032,7 +1033,7 @@ again:
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
- if (ret == 0 && run_ioctl > 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
close(fd);
@@ -1057,13 +1058,13 @@ fail:
}
int btrfs_scan_for_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, u64 total_devs,
- int run_ioctls)
+ u64 flags)
{
int ret;
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(run_ioctls);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(flags);
if (ret)
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", run_ioctls);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1294,7 +1295,7 @@ int set_label(const char *btrfs_dev, const char *label)
set_label_mounted(btrfs_dev, label);
}
-int btrfs_scan_block_devices(int run_ioctl)
+int btrfs_scan_block_devices(u64 flags)
{
struct stat st;
@@ -1361,7 +1362,7 @@ scan_again:
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
- if (ret == 0 && run_ioctl > 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
close(fd);
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index 0b681ed..c4d0d00 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include "ctree.h"
#define BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
+#define BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER (1ULL << 1)
int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char *label,
u64 blocks[6], u64 num_bytes, u32 nodesize,
@@ -35,9 +36,9 @@ int btrfs_add_to_fsid(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 block_count, u32 io_width, u32 io_align,
u32 sectorsize);
int btrfs_scan_for_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, u64 total_devs,
- int run_ioctls);
+ u64 flags);
void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname);
-int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl);
+int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, u64 flags);
int check_mounted(const char *devicename);
int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_mnt);
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ int btrfs_device_already_in_root(struct btrfs_root *root, int fd,
int super_offset);
char *pretty_sizes(u64 size);
int get_mountpt(char *dev, char *mntpt, size_t size);
-int btrfs_scan_block_devices(int run_ioctl);
+int btrfs_scan_block_devices(u64 flags);
u64 parse_size(char *s);
int open_file_or_dir(const char *fname);
int get_device_info(int fd, u64 devid,
--
1.8.1.191.g414c78c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super
2013-03-08 15:24 [PATCH 0/3 v2] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-08 15:24 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device Anand Jain
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-08 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
As of now btrfs_read_dev_super() reads the backup super block
by default and calling function has no control. However in the
following patch we would see that is undesirable.
So with the flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB the calling function
can now indicate if btrfs_read_dev_super should scan for
the backup SB when primary SB fails.
This patch just provides the frame-work, keeping all the logic
in the code same with or without this patch.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
disk-io.c | 10 +++++++---
disk-io.h | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 3 ++-
utils.h | 1 +
volumes.c | 4 +++-
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 5197456..33e7e78 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -877,7 +877,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
fs_info->super_bytenr = sb_bytenr;
disk_super = &fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
- disk_super, sb_bytenr);
+ disk_super, sb_bytenr,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
@@ -1100,7 +1101,8 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
return info->fs_root;
}
-int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
+int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
+ u64 flags)
{
u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
int fsid_is_initialized = 0;
@@ -1109,6 +1111,7 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
int ret;
u64 transid = 0;
u64 bytenr;
+ int max;
if (sb_bytenr != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
ret = pread64(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf), sb_bytenr);
@@ -1123,7 +1126,8 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
+ max = flags & BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB ? BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX : 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(i);
ret = pread64(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf), bytenr);
if (ret < sizeof(buf))
diff --git a/disk-io.h b/disk-io.h
index ff87958..38c6b4f 100644
--- a/disk-io.h
+++ b/disk-io.h
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ int close_ctree(struct btrfs_root *root);
int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_root *root);
int write_ctree_super(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root);
-int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr);
+int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
+ u64 flags);
int btrfs_map_bh_to_logical(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *bh,
u64 logical);
struct extent_buffer *btrfs_find_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root,
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index 234daf4..c76de2b 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
fs_info->super_bytenr = BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET;
disk_super = &fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
- disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index c4d0d00..4641ce3 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#define BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
#define BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER (1ULL << 1)
+#define BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB (1ULL << 2)
int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char *label,
u64 blocks[6], u64 num_bytes, u32 nodesize,
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index ca1b402..b6e3f29 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include "transaction.h"
#include "print-tree.h"
#include "volumes.h"
+#include "utils.h"
struct stripe {
struct btrfs_device *dev;
@@ -225,7 +226,8 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
goto error;
}
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
- ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset);
+ ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
--
1.8.1.191.g414c78c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
2013-03-08 15:24 [PATCH 0/3 v2] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
2013-03-08 15:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-08 15:25 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-11 15:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 0/3 v4] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
4 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-08 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
bug:
-------
mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb -f && yes| mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /ext4
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd (run twice)
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
::
ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
adding device /dev/sdd id 2
fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc
nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 3.11GB
--------
Since we run mkfs.btrfs twice above, there is already a stale
btrfs when mkfs.btrfs is run for the 2nd time. which kicks in
btrfs_scan_for_fsid() to perform a system-wide scan to find the
stale btrfs's partner (to check if that by any chance is mounted)
which in process comes across /dev/sdb. Now when it finds
/dev/sdb it finds that primary SB is not present and we need
to stop him there.
This is done by NOT setting BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for the function
btrfs_scan_for_fsid(). To ensure rest of the logic is unaffected,
this patch will ensure BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB is set for all other
places except at check_mounted_where().
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
cmds-device.c | 3 ++-
cmds-filesystem.c | 2 +-
cmds-replace.c | 3 ++-
disk-io.c | 7 ++++---
find-root.c | 5 +++--
utils.c | 9 ++++++---
volumes.c | 4 ++--
volumes.h | 2 +-
8 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 1b8f378..9447e7f 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++ b/cmds-device.c
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ static int cmd_scan_dev(int argc, char **argv)
printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
if(checklist)
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER|
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
else
ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret){
diff --git a/cmds-filesystem.c b/cmds-filesystem.c
index 2210020..d2e708d 100644
--- a/cmds-filesystem.c
+++ b/cmds-filesystem.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int cmd_show(int argc, char **argv)
usage(cmd_show_usage);
if(checklist)
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(0);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
else
ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 0);
diff --git a/cmds-replace.c b/cmds-replace.c
index 4cc32df..f6e1619 100644
--- a/cmds-replace.c
+++ b/cmds-replace.c
@@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ static int cmd_start_replace(int argc, char **argv)
goto leave_with_error;
}
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fddstdev, dstdev, &fs_devices_mnt,
- &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret >= 0 && !force_using_targetdev) {
fprintf(stderr,
"Error, target device %s contains filesystem, use '-f' to force overwriting.\n",
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 33e7e78..914b567 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -825,7 +825,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
posix_fadvise(fp, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED);
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fp, path, &fs_devices,
- &total_devs, sb_bytenr);
+ &total_devs, sb_bytenr,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "No valid Btrfs found on %s\n", path);
@@ -834,7 +835,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
if (total_devs != 1) {
ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
- BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER|BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
@@ -1102,7 +1103,7 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
}
int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
- u64 flags)
+ u64 flags)
{
u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
int fsid_is_initialized = 0;
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index c76de2b..40cacf1 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
u64 features;
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, device, &fs_devices,
- &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "No valid Btrfs found on %s\n", device);
@@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
if (total_devs != 1) {
ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
- BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER|BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index feee572..95dee29 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -835,7 +835,8 @@ int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
/* scan the initial device */
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, file, &fs_devices_mnt,
- &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
is_btrfs = (ret >= 0);
/* scan other devices */
@@ -1032,7 +1033,8 @@ again:
}
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
- BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
@@ -1361,7 +1363,8 @@ scan_again:
}
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
- BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ flags);
if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index b6e3f29..e1795e3 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ fail:
int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret,
- u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset)
+ u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset, u64 flags)
{
struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
char *buf;
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
}
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ flags);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
diff --git a/volumes.h b/volumes.h
index 911f788..f87aa5b 100644
--- a/volumes.h
+++ b/volumes.h
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ int btrfs_update_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_device *device);
int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret,
- u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset);
+ u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset, u64 flags);
int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree, u64 logical, u64 len);
int btrfs_bootstrap_super_map(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
--
1.8.1.191.g414c78c
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
2013-03-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-11 15:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-11 18:16 ` David Sterba
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-11 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 3/8/13 9:25 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
> bug:
> -------
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb -f && yes| mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /ext4
> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd (run twice)
> mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
> ::
> ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
> ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
> adding device /dev/sdd id 2
> fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc
> nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 3.11GB
> --------
>
> Since we run mkfs.btrfs twice above, there is already a stale
> btrfs when mkfs.btrfs is run for the 2nd time. which kicks in
> btrfs_scan_for_fsid() to perform a system-wide scan to find the
> stale btrfs's partner (to check if that by any chance is mounted)
> which in process comes across /dev/sdb. Now when it finds
> /dev/sdb it finds that primary SB is not present and we need
> to stop him there.
> This is done by NOT setting BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for the function
> btrfs_scan_for_fsid(). To ensure rest of the logic is unaffected,
> this patch will ensure BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB is set for all other
> places except at check_mounted_where().
Thanks, this seems like progress in the right direction.
But that means that many other paths will still scan backups, right?
In the following case sdb1 is an ext4-mounted partition w/ a stale btrfs
backup superblock present in the middle.
# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
# mount | grep sdb1
/dev/sdb1 on /mnt/test type ext4 (rw)
# btrfs device scan /dev/sdb1
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems in '/dev/sdb1'
ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb1' - Device or resource busy
Perhaps this is ok since we explicitly told it to scan an
ext4-mounted device.
[[But, then if I unmount it:
# btrfs device scan /dev/sdb1
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems in '/dev/sdb1'
ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb1' - Invalid argument
weird, not sure where that came from. :( Unrelated to this question
though.]]
Also:
# btrfs filesystem show /dev/sdb1
Label: none uuid: a96ea6e6-d3d5-444d-9aaf-057ec579dffe
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 28.00KB
devid 1 size 4.00GB used 445.50MB path /dev/sdb1
whoa, ok, so it's a currently mounted ext4 device, but filesystem
show tells me it's btrfs?
How about this one:
# mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
# mount | grep sdb1
/dev/sdb1 on /mnt/test type ext4 (rw)
# btrfs check /dev/sdb1
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb1
UUID: a96ea6e6-d3d5-444d-9aaf-057ec579dffe
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 28672 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 28672
total fs tree bytes: 8192
btree space waste bytes: 22875
file data blocks allocated: 0
referenced 0
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-194-g3deeb4c
So my mountged ext4 fs is also a perfectly consistent btrfs fs?
and I think the list goes on.
IMHO, nothing should be checking the backup superblocks unless explicitly
told to. i.e. in e2fsprogs, e2fsck has:
-b superblock
Instead of using the normal superblock, use an alternative
superblock specified by superblock.
and debugfs has:
-s superblock
Causes the file system superblock to be read from the given
block number, instead of using the primary superblock
I think the backups need to be used for explicit recovery (and maybe to
be checked once the primary has been confirmed) and never used during any
normal operation, if the first one is found to be missing.
-Eric
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> cmds-device.c | 3 ++-
> cmds-filesystem.c | 2 +-
> cmds-replace.c | 3 ++-
> disk-io.c | 7 ++++---
> find-root.c | 5 +++--
> utils.c | 9 ++++++---
> volumes.c | 4 ++--
> volumes.h | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
> index 1b8f378..9447e7f 100644
> --- a/cmds-device.c
> +++ b/cmds-device.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ static int cmd_scan_dev(int argc, char **argv)
>
> printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
> if(checklist)
> - ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
> + ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER|
> + BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> else
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
> if (ret){
> diff --git a/cmds-filesystem.c b/cmds-filesystem.c
> index 2210020..d2e708d 100644
> --- a/cmds-filesystem.c
> +++ b/cmds-filesystem.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int cmd_show(int argc, char **argv)
> usage(cmd_show_usage);
>
> if(checklist)
> - ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(0);
> + ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> else
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 0);
>
> diff --git a/cmds-replace.c b/cmds-replace.c
> index 4cc32df..f6e1619 100644
> --- a/cmds-replace.c
> +++ b/cmds-replace.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ static int cmd_start_replace(int argc, char **argv)
> goto leave_with_error;
> }
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fddstdev, dstdev, &fs_devices_mnt,
> - &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> + &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
> + BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> if (ret >= 0 && !force_using_targetdev) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> "Error, target device %s contains filesystem, use '-f' to force overwriting.\n",
> diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
> index 33e7e78..914b567 100644
> --- a/disk-io.c
> +++ b/disk-io.c
> @@ -825,7 +825,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
> posix_fadvise(fp, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED);
>
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fp, path, &fs_devices,
> - &total_devs, sb_bytenr);
> + &total_devs, sb_bytenr,
> + BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
>
> if (ret) {
> fprintf(stderr, "No valid Btrfs found on %s\n", path);
> @@ -834,7 +835,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
>
> if (total_devs != 1) {
> ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
> - BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
> + BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER|BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1102,7 +1103,7 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
> }
>
> int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
> - u64 flags)
> + u64 flags)
> {
> u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
> int fsid_is_initialized = 0;
> diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
> index c76de2b..40cacf1 100644
> --- a/find-root.c
> +++ b/find-root.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
> u64 features;
>
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, device, &fs_devices,
> - &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> + &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
> + BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
>
> if (ret) {
> fprintf(stderr, "No valid Btrfs found on %s\n", device);
> @@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
>
> if (total_devs != 1) {
> ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
> - BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
> + BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER|BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
> index feee572..95dee29 100644
> --- a/utils.c
> +++ b/utils.c
> @@ -835,7 +835,8 @@ int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
>
> /* scan the initial device */
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, file, &fs_devices_mnt,
> - &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> + &total_devs, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
> + BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> is_btrfs = (ret >= 0);
>
> /* scan other devices */
> @@ -1032,7 +1033,8 @@ again:
> }
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
> &num_devices,
> - BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
> + BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
> btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
> }
> @@ -1361,7 +1363,8 @@ scan_again:
> }
> ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
> &num_devices,
> - BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
> + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
> + flags);
> if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
> btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
> }
> diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
> index b6e3f29..e1795e3 100644
> --- a/volumes.c
> +++ b/volumes.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ fail:
>
> int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
> struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret,
> - u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset)
> + u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset, u64 flags)
> {
> struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super;
> char *buf;
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
> }
> disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
> ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
> - BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> + flags);
> if (ret < 0) {
> ret = -EIO;
> goto error_brelse;
> diff --git a/volumes.h b/volumes.h
> index 911f788..f87aa5b 100644
> --- a/volumes.h
> +++ b/volumes.h
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ int btrfs_update_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_device *device);
> int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
> struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_ret,
> - u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset);
> + u64 *total_devs, u64 super_offset, u64 flags);
> int btrfs_num_copies(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree, u64 logical, u64 len);
> int btrfs_bootstrap_super_map(struct btrfs_mapping_tree *map_tree,
> struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
2013-03-11 15:03 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-03-11 18:16 ` David Sterba
2013-03-13 11:46 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2013-03-11 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Anand Jain, linux-btrfs
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> IMHO, nothing should be checking the backup superblocks unless explicitly
> told to.
That's the whole point I believe.
update the infrastructure, every SB access looks to the first copy
unless told by command line options.
david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
2013-03-11 18:16 ` David Sterba
@ 2013-03-13 11:46 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-14 8:51 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-13 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsterba, Eric Sandeen, linux-btrfs
Thanks Eric and David.
I have sent out V3 patch-set which will disable access
to backup super-block unless requested by the user.
here below are some test cases and results before and
after this fix.. which finds the patch works awesome.
--------
the original problem which all this started..
mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb -f && yes| mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /ext4
~/before/mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd (run twice)
~/before/mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
::
ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
adding device /dev/sdd id 2
fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc
nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 3.11GB
after the fix.
# mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
adding device /dev/sdd id 2
fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc
nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 104.98GB
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
-------------
# umount /ext4
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && wipefs /dev/sdb
There is an existing bug..
# ~/before/btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
enabling repair mode
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
UUID: e03c477d-b696-46c1-bf79-43b8b8454f11
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
#
and its still there even after this patch :-)
# btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
enabling repair mode
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
UUID: e03c477d-b696-46c1-bf79-43b8b8454f11
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
-------------------------
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && yes|mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
without the fix
# ~/before/btrfs restore -o /dev/sdb ~/tmp
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
Root objectid is 5
with the fix
# btrfs restore -o /dev/sdb ~/tmp
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
Could not open root, trying backup super
Root objectid is 5
now I say to use sb backup 1..
# btrfs restore -u 1 -o /dev/sdb ~/tmp
Root objectid is 5
# echo $?
0
--------------
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && yes|mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
# ~/before/btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
enabling repair mode
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
UUID: 5dc5c663-eeea-4ec2-b8fe-170157f5d68d
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 28672 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 28672
total fs tree bytes: 8192
btree space waste bytes: 22420
file data blocks allocated: 0
referenced 0
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-235-gdd21bc1
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && yes|mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
since now new code doesn't read backup SB of devid1
it hits the earlier known bug.
# btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
enabling repair mode
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
So user would need to fix the devid1 first.
# btrfs check /dev/sdb --repair
enabling repair mode
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
# btrfs check -s 1 /dev/sdb --repair
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
enabling repair mode
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb
UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 28672 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 28672
total fs tree bytes: 8192
btree space waste bytes: 22420
file data blocks allocated: 0
referenced 0
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
# btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
enabling repair mode
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Need to write back the backup SB to primary SB.
IMO when -s 1 was given it had the chance to fix
primary.. this can be fixed later.
# ./btrfs-select-super -s 1 /dev/sdb
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
# btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
enabling repair mode
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 28672 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 28672
total fs tree bytes: 8192
btree space waste bytes: 22420
file data blocks allocated: 0
referenced 0
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
---------------------------------------------------------------
I am not sure if I have a wipe -a working for btrfs,
so I would clean using dd.
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024+64))
8+0 records in
8+0 records out
8 bytes (8 B) copied, 0.000324503 s, 24.7 kB/s
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024*1024+64))
8+0 records in
8+0 records out
8 bytes (8 B) copied, 0.000364635 s, 21.9 kB/s
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((256*1024*1024*1024+64))
dd: `/dev/sdb': cannot seek: Invalid argument
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000430846 s, 0.0 kB/s
This behavior is same before and after the patch.
# btrfs check /dev/sdb
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
# btrfs check /dev/sdb -s 1
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
# btrfs check /dev/sdb -s 2
using SB copy 2, bytenr 274877906944
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
#
------------------------
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && mount /dev/sdc /btrfs
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024+64))
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024*1024+64))
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((256*1024*1024*1024+64))
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
/dev/sdb is mounted
# umount /btrfs
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
/dev/sdb appears to contain an existing filesystem (btrfs).
Use the -f option to force overwrite.
#
-------------------------
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdd /dev/sde -f
WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
adding device /dev/sde id 2
fs created label (null) on /dev/sdd
nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 93.22GB
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
# mount /dev/sde /btrfs
# umount /btrfs
# dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sde seek=$((64*1024+64))
8+0 records in
8+0 records out
8 bytes (8 B) copied, 0.0149415 s, 0.5 kB/s
remove /dev/sdd
# x="0 0 3 0"
# echo "scsi remove-single-device $x" > /proc/scsi/scsi
# lsscsi
[0:0:0:0] disk Sun boot1 V1.0 /dev/sda
[0:0:2:0] disk Sun boot3 V1.0 /dev/sdc
[0:0:4:0] disk Sun boot5 V1.0 /dev/sde
[0:1:0:0] disk SEAGATE ST914602SSUN146G 0603 -
[0:1:1:0] disk SEAGATE ST914602SSUN146G 0603 -
[0:3:0:0] enclosu ADAPTEC Virtual SGPIO 0 0001 -
# btrfs check /dev/sde
No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sde
# btrfs check /dev/sde -s 1
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
Checking filesystem on /dev/sde
UUID: fa08122d-832f-4f32-87ee-58eb9380d5da
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 815104 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 28672
total fs tree bytes: 8192
btree space waste bytes: 21476
file data blocks allocated: 786432
referenced 786432
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
# ./btrfs-select-super -s 1 /dev/sde
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc' - Invalid argument
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
# btrfs check /dev/sde
warning, device 1 is missing
warning, device 1 is missing
warning devid 1 not found already
Checking filesystem on /dev/sde
UUID: fa08122d-832f-4f32-87ee-58eb9380d5da
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 815104 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 28672
total fs tree bytes: 8192
btree space waste bytes: 21476
file data blocks allocated: 786432
referenced 786432
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
#
---------------
Thanks, Anand
On 03/12/2013 02:16 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> IMHO, nothing should be checking the backup superblocks unless explicitly
>> told to.
>
> That's the whole point I believe.
>
> update the infrastructure, every SB access looks to the first copy
> unless told by command line options.
>
>
> david
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
2013-03-13 11:46 ` Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 8:51 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-14 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dsterba, Eric Sandeen, linux-btrfs
just for the record, this patch also fixes the following 2 issues..
sdc contains primary-SB of ext4 and backup SB of btrfs
# blkid /dev/sdc
/dev/sdc: UUID="4450e281-db04-4736-a03e-1ce6deda74f3" TYPE="ext4"
#
# btrfs-show-super -i 1 /dev/sdc
superblock: bytenr=67108864, device=/dev/sdc
::
----
# ~/before/btrfs dev scan
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems
ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc' - Invalid argument
# btrfs dev scan
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems
----
-----
# ~/before/btrfs fi show
::
Label: none uuid: aa8b3f0c-3ade-490a-a35d-dd62dbd9cc07
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 796.00KB
devid 2 size 59.99GB used 2.01GB path /dev/sdc
*** Some devices missing
::
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-235-gdd21bc1
#
# btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: 0d690e00-a34f-4c6b-9660-c6b1b6684ecc
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 28.00KB
devid 1 size 59.99GB used 2.04GB path /dev/sdb
Label: none uuid: fa08122d-832f-4f32-87ee-58eb9380d5da
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 796.00KB
devid 2 size 48.23GB used 2.01GB path /dev/sde
devid 1 size 44.99GB used 2.03GB path /dev/sdd
Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g5d571b4-dirty
-----
Thanks, Anand
On 03/13/2013 07:46 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Eric and David.
>
> I have sent out V3 patch-set which will disable access
> to backup super-block unless requested by the user.
>
> here below are some test cases and results before and
> after this fix.. which finds the patch works awesome.
>
>
> --------
> the original problem which all this started..
>
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb -f && yes| mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb && mount /dev/sdb /ext4
> ~/before/mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd (run twice)
> ~/before/mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
> ::
> ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
> ERROR: unable to scan the device '/dev/sdb' - Device or resource busy
> adding device /dev/sdd id 2
> fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc
> nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 3.11GB
>
>
> after the fix.
>
> # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
>
> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
> WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
>
> adding device /dev/sdd id 2
> fs created label (null) on /dev/sdc
> nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 104.98GB
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
> -------------
>
> # umount /ext4
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && wipefs /dev/sdb
>
> There is an existing bug..
>
> # ~/before/btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
> enabling repair mode
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
> UUID: e03c477d-b696-46c1-bf79-43b8b8454f11
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
> #
>
> and its still there even after this patch :-)
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
> enabling repair mode
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
> UUID: e03c477d-b696-46c1-bf79-43b8b8454f11
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> -------------------------
>
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && yes|mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
>
> without the fix
> # ~/before/btrfs restore -o /dev/sdb ~/tmp
> ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
> ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
> Root objectid is 5
>
> with the fix
>
> # btrfs restore -o /dev/sdb ~/tmp
> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
> Could not open root, trying backup super
> Root objectid is 5
>
> now I say to use sb backup 1..
>
> # btrfs restore -u 1 -o /dev/sdb ~/tmp
> Root objectid is 5
> # echo $?
> 0
>
> --------------
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && yes|mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
>
> # ~/before/btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
> enabling repair mode
> ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
> ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
> UUID: 5dc5c663-eeea-4ec2-b8fe-170157f5d68d
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> found 28672 bytes used err is 0
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 28672
> total fs tree bytes: 8192
> btree space waste bytes: 22420
> file data blocks allocated: 0
> referenced 0
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-235-gdd21bc1
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && yes|mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb
>
> since now new code doesn't read backup SB of devid1
> it hits the earlier known bug.
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
> enabling repair mode
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
> UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> So user would need to fix the devid1 first.
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdb --repair
> enabling repair mode
> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
>
> # btrfs check -s 1 /dev/sdb --repair
> using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
> enabling repair mode
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb
> UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> found 28672 bytes used err is 0
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 28672
> total fs tree bytes: 8192
> btree space waste bytes: 22420
> file data blocks allocated: 0
> referenced 0
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
> enabling repair mode
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
> UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> btrfs: extent-tree.c:2553: btrfs_reserve_extent: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
>
> Need to write back the backup SB to primary SB.
> IMO when -s 1 was given it had the chance to fix
> primary.. this can be fixed later.
>
> # ./btrfs-select-super -s 1 /dev/sdb
> using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
> ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdb' - Invalid argument
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdc --repair
> enabling repair mode
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sdc
> UUID: daa0dc6d-35b6-43ab-8333-894710a5b917
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> found 28672 bytes used err is 0
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 28672
> total fs tree bytes: 8192
> btree space waste bytes: 22420
> file data blocks allocated: 0
> referenced 0
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> I am not sure if I have a wipe -a working for btrfs,
> so I would clean using dd.
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024+64))
> 8+0 records in
> 8+0 records out
> 8 bytes (8 B) copied, 0.000324503 s, 24.7 kB/s
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024*1024+64))
> 8+0 records in
> 8+0 records out
> 8 bytes (8 B) copied, 0.000364635 s, 21.9 kB/s
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((256*1024*1024*1024+64))
> dd: `/dev/sdb': cannot seek: Invalid argument
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes (0 B) copied, 0.000430846 s, 0.0 kB/s
>
> This behavior is same before and after the patch.
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sdb
> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
> # btrfs check /dev/sdb -s 1
> using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
> # btrfs check /dev/sdb -s 2
> using SB copy 2, bytenr 274877906944
> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sdb
> #
> ------------------------
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && mount /dev/sdc /btrfs
>
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024+64))
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb seek=$((64*1024*1024+64))
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sdb
> seek=$((256*1024*1024*1024+64))
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
>
> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
> WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
>
> /dev/sdb is mounted
>
>
> # umount /btrfs
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb
>
> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
> WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
>
> /dev/sdb appears to contain an existing filesystem (btrfs).
> Use the -f option to force overwrite.
> #
>
> -------------------------
>
>
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdd /dev/sde -f
>
> WARNING! - Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty IS EXPERIMENTAL
> WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
>
> adding device /dev/sde id 2
> fs created label (null) on /dev/sdd
> nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 93.22GB
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
> # mount /dev/sde /btrfs
> # umount /btrfs
> # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1 count=8 of=/dev/sde seek=$((64*1024+64))
> 8+0 records in
> 8+0 records out
> 8 bytes (8 B) copied, 0.0149415 s, 0.5 kB/s
>
> remove /dev/sdd
>
> # x="0 0 3 0"
> # echo "scsi remove-single-device $x" > /proc/scsi/scsi
> # lsscsi
> [0:0:0:0] disk Sun boot1 V1.0 /dev/sda
> [0:0:2:0] disk Sun boot3 V1.0 /dev/sdc
> [0:0:4:0] disk Sun boot5 V1.0 /dev/sde
> [0:1:0:0] disk SEAGATE ST914602SSUN146G 0603 -
> [0:1:1:0] disk SEAGATE ST914602SSUN146G 0603 -
> [0:3:0:0] enclosu ADAPTEC Virtual SGPIO 0 0001 -
>
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sde
> No valid Btrfs found on /dev/sde
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sde -s 1
> using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sde
> UUID: fa08122d-832f-4f32-87ee-58eb9380d5da
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> found 815104 bytes used err is 0
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 28672
> total fs tree bytes: 8192
> btree space waste bytes: 21476
> file data blocks allocated: 786432
> referenced 786432
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
>
> # ./btrfs-select-super -s 1 /dev/sde
> using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864
> ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc' - Invalid argument
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
>
> # btrfs check /dev/sde
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning, device 1 is missing
> warning devid 1 not found already
> Checking filesystem on /dev/sde
> UUID: fa08122d-832f-4f32-87ee-58eb9380d5da
> checking extents
> checking fs roots
> checking root refs
> found 815104 bytes used err is 0
> total csum bytes: 0
> total tree bytes: 28672
> total fs tree bytes: 8192
> btree space waste bytes: 21476
> file data blocks allocated: 786432
> referenced 786432
> Btrfs v0.20-rc1-238-g170881a-dirty
> #
> ---------------
>
>
> Thanks, Anand
>
>
> On 03/12/2013 02:16 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> IMHO, nothing should be checking the backup superblocks unless
>>> explicitly
>>> told to.
>>
>> That's the whole point I believe.
>>
>> update the infrastructure, every SB access looks to the first copy
>> unless told by command line options.
>>
>>
>> david
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3 v3] flags to access backup SB
2013-03-08 15:24 [PATCH 0/3 v2] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-08 15:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-13 11:44 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
` (2 more replies)
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 0/3 v4] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
4 siblings, 3 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
We need a mechanism to tell when to use the backup super_block.
To do this it needs a frame-work, and the patch #1 and #2 below
provides the same without change in the logic. The last patch
uses the framework to fix the bug(s).
v2->v3:
Accepts David and Eric review, which would result in disabled
access to backup-superblock by default.
Dropped the patch
[PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
Introduced a new patch
[PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
v1->v2:
Accepts Eric and Zach review.
Separates fix into 3 patches for easy logical understanding
Anand Jain (3):
btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl
btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for
btrfs_read_dev_super
btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
btrfsctl.c | 2 +-
cmds-device.c | 4 ++--
disk-io.c | 13 +++++++++----
disk-io.h | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 6 ++++--
utils.c | 17 +++++++++--------
utils.h | 8 +++++---
volumes.c | 4 +++-
8 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-13 11:44 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default Anand Jain
2 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace the parameter run_ioctl
which controls calling the function btrfs_register_one_device().
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
btrfsctl.c | 2 +-
cmds-device.c | 4 ++--
disk-io.c | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 3 ++-
utils.c | 17 +++++++++--------
utils.h | 7 ++++---
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfsctl.c b/btrfsctl.c
index 8fd8cc3..75bc52d 100644
--- a/btrfsctl.c
+++ b/btrfsctl.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
if (ac == 2 && strcmp(av[1], "-a") == 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
- btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
+ btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
exit(0);
}
for (i = 1; i < ac; i++) {
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 58df6da..1b8f378 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++ b/cmds-device.c
@@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ static int cmd_scan_dev(int argc, char **argv)
printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
if(checklist)
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
else
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret){
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: error %d while scanning\n", ret);
return 18;
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index a9fd374..8205b3c 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
}
if (total_devs != 1) {
- ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index f99fb76..ca41447 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
}
if (total_devs != 1) {
- ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index f68436d..c29861b 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -840,7 +840,8 @@ int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
/* scan other devices */
if (is_btrfs && total_devs > 1) {
- if((ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices_mnt, total_devs, 1)))
+ if((ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices_mnt, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER)))
return ret;
}
@@ -951,7 +952,7 @@ void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname)
close(fd);
}
-int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl)
+int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, u64 flags)
{
DIR *dirp = NULL;
struct dirent *dirent;
@@ -1032,7 +1033,7 @@ again:
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
- if (ret == 0 && run_ioctl > 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
close(fd);
@@ -1057,13 +1058,13 @@ fail:
}
int btrfs_scan_for_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, u64 total_devs,
- int run_ioctls)
+ u64 flags)
{
int ret;
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(run_ioctls);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(flags);
if (ret)
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", run_ioctls);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1294,7 +1295,7 @@ int set_label(const char *btrfs_dev, const char *label)
set_label_mounted(btrfs_dev, label);
}
-int btrfs_scan_block_devices(int run_ioctl)
+int btrfs_scan_block_devices(u64 flags)
{
struct stat st;
@@ -1361,7 +1362,7 @@ scan_again:
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
- if (ret == 0 && run_ioctl > 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
close(fd);
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index 0b681ed..c4d0d00 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include "ctree.h"
#define BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
+#define BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER (1ULL << 1)
int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char *label,
u64 blocks[6], u64 num_bytes, u32 nodesize,
@@ -35,9 +36,9 @@ int btrfs_add_to_fsid(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 block_count, u32 io_width, u32 io_align,
u32 sectorsize);
int btrfs_scan_for_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, u64 total_devs,
- int run_ioctls);
+ u64 flags);
void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname);
-int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl);
+int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, u64 flags);
int check_mounted(const char *devicename);
int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_mnt);
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ int btrfs_device_already_in_root(struct btrfs_root *root, int fd,
int super_offset);
char *pretty_sizes(u64 size);
int get_mountpt(char *dev, char *mntpt, size_t size);
-int btrfs_scan_block_devices(int run_ioctl);
+int btrfs_scan_block_devices(u64 flags);
u64 parse_size(char *s);
int open_file_or_dir(const char *fname);
int get_device_info(int fd, u64 devid,
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-13 11:44 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default Anand Jain
2 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
As of now btrfs_read_dev_super() reads the backup super block
by default and calling function has no control. However in the
following patch we would see that is undesirable.
So with the flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB the calling function
can now indicate if btrfs_read_dev_super should scan for
the backup SB when primary SB fails.
This patch just provides the frame-work, keeping all the logic
in the code same with or without this patch.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
disk-io.c | 10 +++++++---
disk-io.h | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 3 ++-
utils.h | 1 +
volumes.c | 4 +++-
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 8205b3c..796394f 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -879,7 +879,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
fs_info->super_bytenr = sb_bytenr;
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
- disk_super, sb_bytenr);
+ disk_super, sb_bytenr,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
@@ -1102,7 +1103,8 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
return info->fs_root;
}
-int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
+int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
+ u64 flags)
{
u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
int fsid_is_initialized = 0;
@@ -1111,6 +1113,7 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
int ret;
u64 transid = 0;
u64 bytenr;
+ int max;
if (sb_bytenr != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
ret = pread64(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf), sb_bytenr);
@@ -1125,7 +1128,8 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
+ max = flags & BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB ? BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX : 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(i);
ret = pread64(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf), bytenr);
if (ret < sizeof(buf))
diff --git a/disk-io.h b/disk-io.h
index ff87958..38c6b4f 100644
--- a/disk-io.h
+++ b/disk-io.h
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ int close_ctree(struct btrfs_root *root);
int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_root *root);
int write_ctree_super(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root);
-int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr);
+int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
+ u64 flags);
int btrfs_map_bh_to_logical(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *bh,
u64 logical);
struct extent_buffer *btrfs_find_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root,
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index ca41447..9be4fc7 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
fs_info->super_bytenr = BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET;
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
- disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index c4d0d00..4641ce3 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#define BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
#define BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER (1ULL << 1)
+#define BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB (1ULL << 2)
int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char *label,
u64 blocks[6], u64 num_bytes, u32 nodesize,
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 3e52d06..1a28cdd 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include "transaction.h"
#include "print-tree.h"
#include "volumes.h"
+#include "utils.h"
struct stripe {
struct btrfs_device *dev;
@@ -226,7 +227,8 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
goto error;
}
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
- ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset);
+ ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3 v3] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 2/3 v3] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-13 11:44 ` Anand Jain
2 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
disk-io.c | 2 +-
find-root.c | 2 +-
volumes.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 796394f..030f080 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
disk_super, sb_bytenr,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ NULL);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index 9be4fc7..b74cd1e 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ NULL);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 1a28cdd..dfd78fb 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
}
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ NULL);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3 v4] flags to access backup SB
2013-03-08 15:24 [PATCH 0/3 v2] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-03-13 11:44 ` [PATCH 0/3 v3] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 3:05 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 1/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
` (2 more replies)
4 siblings, 3 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-14 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
We need a mechanism to tell when to use the backup super_block.
To do this it needs a frame-work, and the patch #1 and #2 below
provides the same without change in the logic. The last patch
uses the framework to fix the bug(s).
v3->v4:
Fixed some warnings introduced by patch #3 below,
sorry my mistake.
v2->v3:
Accepts David and Eric review, which would result in disabled
access to backup-superblock by default.
Dropped the patch
[PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: use BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag in btrfs_scan_one_device
Introduced a new patch
[PATCH 3/3] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
v1->v2:
Accepts Eric and Zach review.
Separates fix into 3 patches for easy logical understanding
Anand Jain (3):
btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl
btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for
btrfs_read_dev_super
btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
btrfsctl.c | 2 +-
cmds-device.c | 4 ++--
disk-io.c | 13 +++++++++----
disk-io.h | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 6 ++++--
utils.c | 17 +++++++++--------
utils.h | 8 +++++---
volumes.c | 4 +++-
8 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 0/3 v4] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 3:05 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 2/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default Anand Jain
2 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-14 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace the parameter run_ioctl
which controls calling the function btrfs_register_one_device().
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
btrfsctl.c | 2 +-
cmds-device.c | 4 ++--
disk-io.c | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 3 ++-
utils.c | 17 +++++++++--------
utils.h | 7 ++++---
6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfsctl.c b/btrfsctl.c
index 8fd8cc3..75bc52d 100644
--- a/btrfsctl.c
+++ b/btrfsctl.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
if (ac == 2 && strcmp(av[1], "-a") == 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
- btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
+ btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
exit(0);
}
for (i = 1; i < ac; i++) {
diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
index 58df6da..1b8f378 100644
--- a/cmds-device.c
+++ b/cmds-device.c
@@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ static int cmd_scan_dev(int argc, char **argv)
printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems\n");
if(checklist)
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
else
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret){
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: error %d while scanning\n", ret);
return 18;
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index a9fd374..8205b3c 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -834,7 +834,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
}
if (total_devs != 1) {
- ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index f99fb76..ca41447 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
}
if (total_devs != 1) {
- ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs, 1);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index f68436d..c29861b 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -840,7 +840,8 @@ int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
/* scan other devices */
if (is_btrfs && total_devs > 1) {
- if((ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices_mnt, total_devs, 1)))
+ if((ret = btrfs_scan_for_fsid(fs_devices_mnt, total_devs,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER)))
return ret;
}
@@ -951,7 +952,7 @@ void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname)
close(fd);
}
-int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl)
+int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, u64 flags)
{
DIR *dirp = NULL;
struct dirent *dirent;
@@ -1032,7 +1033,7 @@ again:
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
- if (ret == 0 && run_ioctl > 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
close(fd);
@@ -1057,13 +1058,13 @@ fail:
}
int btrfs_scan_for_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, u64 total_devs,
- int run_ioctls)
+ u64 flags)
{
int ret;
- ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(run_ioctls);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(flags);
if (ret)
- ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", run_ioctls);
+ ret = btrfs_scan_one_dir("/dev", flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1294,7 +1295,7 @@ int set_label(const char *btrfs_dev, const char *label)
set_label_mounted(btrfs_dev, label);
}
-int btrfs_scan_block_devices(int run_ioctl)
+int btrfs_scan_block_devices(u64 flags)
{
struct stat st;
@@ -1361,7 +1362,7 @@ scan_again:
ret = btrfs_scan_one_device(fd, fullpath, &tmp_devices,
&num_devices,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
- if (ret == 0 && run_ioctl > 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && flags & BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER) {
btrfs_register_one_device(fullpath);
}
close(fd);
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index 0b681ed..c4d0d00 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include "ctree.h"
#define BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
+#define BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER (1ULL << 1)
int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char *label,
u64 blocks[6], u64 num_bytes, u32 nodesize,
@@ -35,9 +36,9 @@ int btrfs_add_to_fsid(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 block_count, u32 io_width, u32 io_align,
u32 sectorsize);
int btrfs_scan_for_fsid(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices, u64 total_devs,
- int run_ioctls);
+ u64 flags);
void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname);
-int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl);
+int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, u64 flags);
int check_mounted(const char *devicename);
int check_mounted_where(int fd, const char *file, char *where, int size,
struct btrfs_fs_devices **fs_devices_mnt);
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ int btrfs_device_already_in_root(struct btrfs_root *root, int fd,
int super_offset);
char *pretty_sizes(u64 size);
int get_mountpt(char *dev, char *mntpt, size_t size);
-int btrfs_scan_block_devices(int run_ioctl);
+int btrfs_scan_block_devices(u64 flags);
u64 parse_size(char *s);
int open_file_or_dir(const char *fname);
int get_device_info(int fd, u64 devid,
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 0/3 v4] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 1/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 3:05 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default Anand Jain
2 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-14 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
As of now btrfs_read_dev_super() reads the backup super block
by default and calling function has no control. However in the
following patch we would see that is undesirable.
So with the flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB the calling function
can now indicate if btrfs_read_dev_super should scan for
the backup SB when primary SB fails.
This patch just provides the frame-work, keeping all the logic
in the code same with or without this patch.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
disk-io.c | 10 +++++++---
disk-io.h | 3 ++-
find-root.c | 3 ++-
utils.h | 1 +
volumes.c | 4 +++-
5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 8205b3c..796394f 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -879,7 +879,8 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
fs_info->super_bytenr = sb_bytenr;
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
- disk_super, sb_bytenr);
+ disk_super, sb_bytenr,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
@@ -1102,7 +1103,8 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path, u64 sb_bytenr,
return info->fs_root;
}
-int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
+int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
+ u64 flags)
{
u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
int fsid_is_initialized = 0;
@@ -1111,6 +1113,7 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
int ret;
u64 transid = 0;
u64 bytenr;
+ int max;
if (sb_bytenr != BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
ret = pread64(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf), sb_bytenr);
@@ -1125,7 +1128,8 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr)
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
+ max = flags & BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB ? BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX : 1;
+ for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(i);
ret = pread64(fd, &buf, sizeof(buf), bytenr);
if (ret < sizeof(buf))
diff --git a/disk-io.h b/disk-io.h
index ff87958..38c6b4f 100644
--- a/disk-io.h
+++ b/disk-io.h
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ int close_ctree(struct btrfs_root *root);
int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_root *root);
int write_ctree_super(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root);
-int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr);
+int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
+ u64 flags);
int btrfs_map_bh_to_logical(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *bh,
u64 logical);
struct extent_buffer *btrfs_find_tree_block(struct btrfs_root *root,
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index ca41447..9be4fc7 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
fs_info->super_bytenr = BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET;
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
- disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
+ disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/utils.h b/utils.h
index c4d0d00..4641ce3 100644
--- a/utils.h
+++ b/utils.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#define BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
#define BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER (1ULL << 1)
+#define BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB (1ULL << 2)
int make_btrfs(int fd, const char *device, const char *label,
u64 blocks[6], u64 num_bytes, u32 nodesize,
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 3e52d06..1a28cdd 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include "transaction.h"
#include "print-tree.h"
#include "volumes.h"
+#include "utils.h"
struct stripe {
struct btrfs_device *dev;
@@ -226,7 +227,8 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
goto error;
}
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
- ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset);
+ ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
+ BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 0/3 v4] flags to access backup SB Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 1/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER to replace run_ioctl Anand Jain
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 2/3 v4] btrfs-progs: Introduce flag BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for btrfs_read_dev_super Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 3:05 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-14 4:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-14 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
disk-io.c | 2 +-
find-root.c | 2 +-
volumes.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
index 796394f..c2e1c8a 100644
--- a/disk-io.c
+++ b/disk-io.c
@@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
disk_super, sb_bytenr,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ 0ull);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
index 9be4fc7..9923209 100644
--- a/find-root.c
+++ b/find-root.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ 0ull);
if (ret) {
printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
goto out_devices;
diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
index 1a28cdd..9003412 100644
--- a/volumes.c
+++ b/volumes.c
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
}
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
- BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
+ 0ull);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = -EIO;
goto error_brelse;
--
1.8.1.227.g44fe835
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-14 3:05 ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 4:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-14 8:56 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-14 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 3/13/13 10:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
<maybe a little more commit log would be good?>
So here is what confuses me now. :)
*every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with
0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup
under any circumstance.
If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument?
Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument
later?
-Eric
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
> ---
> disk-io.c | 2 +-
> find-root.c | 2 +-
> volumes.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/disk-io.c b/disk-io.c
> index 796394f..c2e1c8a 100644
> --- a/disk-io.c
> +++ b/disk-io.c
> @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ static struct btrfs_fs_info *__open_ctree_fd(int fp, const char *path,
> disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
> ret =
(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
> disk_super, sb_bytenr,
> - BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> + 0ull);
Isn't just "0" enough?
-Eric
> if (ret) {
> printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
> goto out_devices;
> diff --git a/find-root.c b/find-root.c
> index 9be4fc7..9923209 100644
> --- a/find-root.c
> +++ b/find-root.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static struct btrfs_root *open_ctree_broken(int fd, const char *device)
> disk_super = fs_info->super_copy;
> ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fs_devices->latest_bdev,
> disk_super, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET,
> - BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> + 0ull);
> if (ret) {
> printk("No valid btrfs found\n");
> goto out_devices;
> diff --git a/volumes.c b/volumes.c
> index 1a28cdd..9003412 100644
> --- a/volumes.c
> +++ b/volumes.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
> }
> disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
> ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset,
> - BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB);
> + 0ull);
> if (ret < 0) {
> ret = -EIO;
> goto error_brelse;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-14 4:36 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-03-14 8:56 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-14 14:47 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-14 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 03/14/2013 12:36 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/13/13 10:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> <maybe a little more commit log would be good?>
>
> So here is what confuses me now. :)
>
> *every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with
> 0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup
> under any circumstance.
>
> If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument?
> Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument
> later?
Thanks for the review. yes true. as of now it (BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB)
only serves the purpose if in future should we need it.
purpose is something like a user initiated thread which
should to go to the backup-SB if primary-SB is not found ?.
Or I can drop BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB idea depending on how
it is convenient as a whole.
Thanks, Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-14 8:56 ` Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-14 14:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-14 14:49 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-14 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 3/14/13 3:56 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2013 12:36 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 3/13/13 10:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>> <maybe a little more commit log would be good?>
>>
>> So here is what confuses me now. :)
>>
>> *every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with
>> 0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup
>> under any circumstance.
>>
>> If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument?
>> Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument
>> later?
>
> Thanks for the review. yes true. as of now it (BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB)
> only serves the purpose if in future should we need it.
> purpose is something like a user initiated thread which
> should to go to the backup-SB if primary-SB is not found ?.
> Or I can drop BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB idea depending on how
> it is convenient as a whole.
See what others think, perhaps, but if nobody is using it, I think
it should just go away. I'd call it "dead code." :)
But I am surprised that none of the commands which accept alternate
superblock locations find their way into btrfs_read_dev_super() -
that seems odd to me. Is it re-implemented or open-coded in other
places?
-Eric
> Thanks, Anand
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-14 14:47 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-03-14 14:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-15 12:03 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-14 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 3/14/13 9:47 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/14/13 3:56 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/14/2013 12:36 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 3/13/13 10:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>>>
>>> <maybe a little more commit log would be good?>
>>>
>>> So here is what confuses me now. :)
>>>
>>> *every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with
>>> 0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup
>>> under any circumstance.
>>>
>>> If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument?
>>> Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument
>>> later?
>>
>> Thanks for the review. yes true. as of now it (BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB)
>> only serves the purpose if in future should we need it.
>> purpose is something like a user initiated thread which
>> should to go to the backup-SB if primary-SB is not found ?.
>> Or I can drop BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB idea depending on how
>> it is convenient as a whole.
>
> See what others think, perhaps, but if nobody is using it, I think
> it should just go away. I'd call it "dead code." :)
>
> But I am surprised that none of the commands which accept alternate
> superblock locations find their way into btrfs_read_dev_super() -
> that seems odd to me. Is it re-implemented or open-coded in other
> places?
So to be clearer, rather than removing the code right away, maybe
it's worth a look to see if the other commands which *want* backup
superblocks should be using this same code. Then you'd have a reason
for your new flag. :)
-Eric
> -Eric
>
>
>> Thanks, Anand
>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-14 14:49 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-03-15 12:03 ` Anand Jain
2013-03-15 16:34 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-15 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-btrfs
>>>> <maybe a little more commit log would be good?>
>>>>
>>>> So here is what confuses me now. :)
>>>>
>>>> *every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with
>>>> 0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup
>>>> under any circumstance.
>>>>
>>>> If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument?
>>>> Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument
>>>> later?
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review. yes true. as of now it (BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB)
>>> only serves the purpose if in future should we need it.
>>> purpose is something like a user initiated thread which
>>> should to go to the backup-SB if primary-SB is not found ?.
>>> Or I can drop BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB idea depending on how
>>> it is convenient as a whole.
>>
>> See what others think, perhaps, but if nobody is using it, I think
>> it should just go away. I'd call it "dead code." :)
>>
>> But I am surprised that none of the commands which accept alternate
>> superblock locations find their way into btrfs_read_dev_super() -
>> that seems odd to me. Is it re-implemented or open-coded in other
>> places?
>
> So to be clearer, rather than removing the code right away, maybe
> it's worth a look to see if the other commands which *want* backup
> superblocks should be using this same code. Then you'd have a reason
> for your new flag. :)
when non primary SB (sb_bytenr) is specified in btrfs_read_dev_super()
(that is when user is involved) it would directly fetch it. so its
not a problem when we know which SB to read other than the primary SB.
However when primary SB is specified it would look for only primary SB
unless BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag is set (with the patch). Now, do we
need this flag ? looks like Yes ! (sorry to change my opinion here
though) and as below..
In some cases when user is _not_ involved. Like in
check_mounted().
In a multi dev btrfs mounted fs. If by any chance the primary SB
is corrupted then we would say the device is NOT mounted even
if it is mounted.
eg:
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
# ./check-mounted /dev/sdc
its btrfs
/dev/sdc is currently mounted. Aborting.
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc count=8 seek=$(((64 * 1024)/512))
# ./check-mounted /dev/sdc
Not mounted
# cat /proc/mounts | egrep btrfs
/dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs rw,seclabel,relatime,noacl,space_cache 0 0
So we have to set BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for check_mounted()
But the above scenario is not simple enough to be practical though.
-Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-15 12:03 ` Anand Jain
@ 2013-03-15 16:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-18 3:39 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-03-15 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On 3/15/13 7:03 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
>>>>> <maybe a little more commit log would be good?>
>>>>>
>>>>> So here is what confuses me now. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> *every* caller of btrfs_read_dev_super() is now called with
>>>>> 0 for the flags variable, so it never reads the backup
>>>>> under any circumstance.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's always called w/ 0, what is the point of the argument?
>>>>> Is there another patch you have planned that would use this argument
>>>>> later?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the review. yes true. as of now it (BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB)
>>>> only serves the purpose if in future should we need it.
>>>> purpose is something like a user initiated thread which
>>>> should to go to the backup-SB if primary-SB is not found ?.
>>>> Or I can drop BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB idea depending on how
>>>> it is convenient as a whole.
>>>
>>> See what others think, perhaps, but if nobody is using it, I think
>>> it should just go away. I'd call it "dead code." :)
>>>
>>> But I am surprised that none of the commands which accept alternate
>>> superblock locations find their way into btrfs_read_dev_super() -
>>> that seems odd to me. Is it re-implemented or open-coded in other
>>> places?
>>
>> So to be clearer, rather than removing the code right away, maybe
>> it's worth a look to see if the other commands which *want* backup
>> superblocks should be using this same code. Then you'd have a reason
>> for your new flag. :)
>
>
> when non primary SB (sb_bytenr) is specified in btrfs_read_dev_super()
> (that is when user is involved) it would directly fetch it. so its
> not a problem when we know which SB to read other than the primary SB.
Oh, right - I had forgotten that, I'm sorry.
So the behavior is:
if sb_bytenr is specified and it is not the first sb, read it and return
it on success.
Otherwise, read the first superblock and return it if it's ok.
If it's bad, and *if* your new flag is set, continue reading other
superblocks until a good one is found, or return failure if none are found.
Now that I think about it, that's a somewhat convoluted set of behaviors
for one function.
> However when primary SB is specified it would look for only primary SB
> unless BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB flag is set (with the patch).
Right, ok.
> Now, do we
> need this flag ? looks like Yes ! (sorry to change my opinion here
> though) and as below..
>
> In some cases when user is _not_ involved. Like in
>
> check_mounted().
>
> In a multi dev btrfs mounted fs. If by any chance the primary SB
> is corrupted then we would say the device is NOT mounted even
> if it is mounted.
>
> eg:
> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
> # ./check-mounted /dev/sdc
> its btrfs
> /dev/sdc is currently mounted. Aborting.
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc count=8 seek=$(((64 * 1024)/512))
> # ./check-mounted /dev/sdc
what is "./check-mounted?"
> Not mounted
> # cat /proc/mounts | egrep btrfs
> /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs rw,seclabel,relatime,noacl,space_cache 0 0
>
>
> So we have to set BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for check_mounted()
> But the above scenario is not simple enough to be practical though.
(Seems like a mount check would be best implemented by asking the kernel
which devices are in use for mounted btrfs filesystems, rather than
scanning the block devices directly, but maybe that's a different issue.)
I guess I need to stop & think more carefully about this, it seems like
I am not seeing the whole picture.
The overall goal here is to not discover "btrfs" devices which actually
only have stale backup superblocks present, right?
The loop in btrfs_read_dev_super() might be ok for verifying backups,
but it should probably fail outright on the first bad one it finds,
or at least if the primary is bad; the user would be notified of the
inconsistency and could take corrective action w/ fsck or whatnot, right?
-Eric
>
> -Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] btrfs-progs: disable using backup superblock by default
2013-03-15 16:34 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2013-03-18 3:39 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2013-03-18 3:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-btrfs
>> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb /dev/sdc -f && mount /dev/sdb /btrfs
>> # ./check-mounted /dev/sdc
>> its btrfs
>> /dev/sdc is currently mounted. Aborting.
>> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdc count=8 seek=$(((64 * 1024)/512))
>> # ./check-mounted /dev/sdc
>
> what is "./check-mounted?"
sorry forgot to mention.. check-mounted is small prog it unit-tests
check_mounted() function (Find the diff below.)
>> Not mounted
>> # cat /proc/mounts | egrep btrfs
>> /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs rw,seclabel,relatime,noacl,space_cache 0 0
>>
>>
>> So we have to set BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB for check_mounted()
>> But the above scenario is not simple enough to be practical though.
>
> (Seems like a mount check would be best implemented by asking the kernel
> which devices are in use for mounted btrfs filesystems, rather than
> scanning the block devices directly, but maybe that's a different issue.)
>
> I guess I need to stop & think more carefully about this, it seems like
> I am not seeing the whole picture.
>
> The overall goal here is to not discover "btrfs" devices which actually
> only have stale backup superblocks present, right?
>
> The loop in btrfs_read_dev_super() might be ok for verifying backups,
> but it should probably fail outright on the first bad one it finds,
> or at least if the primary is bad; the user would be notified of the
> inconsistency and could take corrective action w/ fsck or whatnot, right?
This logic is not be suitable for the function check_mounted().
The above test case just demonstrates that. This is about btrfs
on multi-dev and we use one dev to mount and another dev to check
if its mounted, now if the primary SB is corrupted on this (latter)
dev we still need to find its mounted by reading from the backup SB,
so setting the BTRFS_SCAN_BACKUP_SB will help.
Thanks, Anand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index d102dee..c97e6b7 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -159,6 +159,10 @@ btrfs-select-super: $(objects) $(libs)
btrfs-select-super.o
@echo " [LD] $@"
$(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o btrfs-select-super $(objects)
btrfs-select-super.o $(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS)
+check-mounted: $(objects) $(libs) check-mounted.o
+ @echo " [LD] $@"
+ $(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o check-mounted $(objects) check-mounted.o
$(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS)
+
btrfstune: $(objects) $(libs) btrfstune.o
@echo " [LD] $@"
$(Q)$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o btrfstune $(objects) btrfstune.o
$(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS)
@@ -205,7 +209,7 @@ clean :
@echo "Cleaning"
$(Q)rm -f $(progs) cscope.out *.o .*.d btrfs-convert
btrfs-image btrfs-select-super \
btrfs-zero-log btrfstune dir-test ioctl-test quick-test
send-test btrfs.static btrfsck \
- version.h \
+ version.h check-mounted\
$(libs) $(lib_links)
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(MAKEOPTS) -C man $@
diff --git a/check-mounted.c b/check-mounted.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..781edec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/check-mounted.c
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+
+#define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500
+#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include "kerncompat.h"
+#include "ctree.h"
+#include "disk-io.h"
+#include "print-tree.h"
+#include "transaction.h"
+#include "list.h"
+#include "version.h"
+#include "utils.h"
+
+int main(int ac, char **av)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if((ret = check_mounted(av[optind])) < 0) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Could not check mount status: %s\n",
strerror(-ret));
+ return ret;
+ } else if(ret) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "%s is currently mounted. Aborting.\n",
av[optind]);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ printf("Not mounted\n");
+ return 0;
+}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread