* [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs
@ 2013-03-21 6:13 Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 4:35 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 13:43 ` Rich Johnston
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang Sheng-Hui @ 2013-03-21 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner, xfstests, linux-btrfs
_require_nobigloopfs has been removed.
We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
---
276 | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/276 b/276
index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755
--- a/276
+++ b/276
@@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
-
-_require_nobigloopfs
+_require_no_large_scratch_dev
_require_btrfs inspect-internal
_require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs
2013-03-21 6:13 [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs Wang Sheng-Hui
@ 2013-03-25 4:35 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 13:43 ` Rich Johnston
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wang Sheng-Hui @ 2013-03-25 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Chinner, xfstests, linux-btrfs
On 2013年03月21日 14:13, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> _require_nobigloopfs has been removed.
> We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
> ---
> 276 | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/276 b/276
> index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755
> --- a/276
> +++ b/276
> @@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root
> _supported_fs btrfs
> _supported_os Linux
> _require_scratch
> -
> -_require_nobigloopfs
> +_require_no_large_scratch_dev
> _require_btrfs inspect-internal
> _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
>
Does anyone notice this?
I use the upstream xfstests and failed this case for the already-removed function.
I think someone patched in but mixed the old function.
I've send out this patch for days, but seems no one cares about it.
If I'm wrong, please let me know.
Thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs
2013-03-21 6:13 [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 4:35 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
@ 2013-03-25 13:43 ` Rich Johnston
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rich Johnston @ 2013-03-25 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang Sheng-Hui; +Cc: Dave Chinner, xfstests, linux-btrfs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1092 bytes --]
On 03/21/2013 01:13 AM, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote:
> _require_nobigloopfs has been removed.
> We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
> ---
> 276 | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/276 b/276
> index 40b30cf..87363ca 100755
> --- a/276
> +++ b/276
> @@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root
> _supported_fs btrfs
> _supported_os Linux
> _require_scratch
> -
> -_require_nobigloopfs
> +_require_no_large_scratch_dev
> _require_btrfs inspect-internal
> _require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
>
Thanks for the patch.
Not sure what is wrong with your patch (trailing space maybe),
but it could not be imported using git quiltimport.
The patch itself makes sense so I have committed the attached:
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
commit 07c1f8d7bae36f2c28ffee6f09c318b1142b6f90
Author: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Mar 21 06:13:23 2013 +0000
xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the
removed _require_nobigloopfs
[-- Attachment #2: p276.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1117 bytes --]
>From patchwork Thu Mar 21 06:13:23 2013
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the
removed _require_nobigloopfs
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 06:13:23 -0000
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 5083
Message-Id: <514AA503.4060101@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, xfstests <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
_require_nobigloopfs has been removed.
We should use _require_no_large_scratch_dev in the test script.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
---
276 | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: b/276
===================================================================
--- a/276
+++ b/276
@@ -58,8 +58,7 @@ _need_to_be_root
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
-
-_require_nobigloopfs
+_require_no_large_scratch_dev
_require_btrfs inspect-internal
_require_command "/usr/sbin/filefrag"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-25 13:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-21 6:13 [PATCH] xfstests 276: use _require_no_large_scratch_dev instead of the removed _require_nobigloopfs Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 4:35 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2013-03-25 13:43 ` Rich Johnston
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).