Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
To: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net,
	wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: cleanup to remove reduplicate code in iterate_extent_inode()
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:08:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5156B985.8060506@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364564554-1848-1-git-send-email-wangshilong1991@gmail.com>

On 03/29/13 14:42, Wang Shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Just remove the unnecessary check and assignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/backref.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> index 3ca413bb..e102b48 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ int iterate_extent_inodes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
>  		ULIST_ITER_INIT(&root_uiter);
> -		while (!ret && (root_node = ulist_next(roots, &root_uiter))) {
> +		while ((root_node = ulist_next(roots, &root_uiter))) {

It doesn't look unnecessary at all to me. ret is set in the loop and
only checked in the while condition.

>  			pr_debug("root %llu references leaf %llu, data list "
>  				 "%#llx\n", root_node->val, ref_node->val,
>  				 (long long)ref_node->aux);
> @@ -1510,7 +1510,6 @@ int iterate_extent_inodes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>  						iterate, ctx);
>  		}
>  		ulist_free(roots);
> -		roots = NULL;

roots gets freed again later on. If you don't set it to NULL, it will
result in a double free.

-Arne

>  	}
>  
>  	free_leaf_list(refs);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-30 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-29 13:42 [PATCH] Btrfs: cleanup to remove reduplicate code in iterate_extent_inode() Wang Shilong
2013-03-30 10:08 ` Arne Jansen [this message]
2013-03-30 11:47   ` Wang Shilong
2013-03-30 11:55   ` Wang Shilong
2013-03-30 13:44     ` Arne Jansen
2013-03-31 10:40       ` Wang Shilong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5156B985.8060506@gmx.net \
    --to=sensille@gmx.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    --cc=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox