Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Swâmi Petaramesh" <swami@petaramesh.org>
To: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>,
	"BTRFS, Linux" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	zfs-discuss@zfsonlinux.org
Subject: Re: Moving...
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:14:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <515B120F.6000004@petaramesh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130402230421.016afe58@natsu>

Le 02/04/2013 19:04, Roman Mamedov a écrit :
> but at this point I trust my data to BTRFS more, than I would trust ZFS.

My experience with ZFS on Linux is still somewhat limited, the only
thing that I can say is that I've used it for about 2 years and a half
on my (quite loaded) home server without ever encoutering a single issue
(besides some tricky Ubuntu version upgrades, only due to the fact that
ZFS is "not in the standard kernel" by opposition to BTRFS).

On the BTRFS side, I've used it on 5 machine for about a year on a daily
basis ; I've completely lost a filesystem, beyond repair, twice ; I
found myself with a machine that wouldn't boot anymore and would
necessitate serious and tricky FS maintenance, 3 times, I had to
completely reinstall the FS because of extremely degraded performance, 4
times.

Add to this that the FS management tools and properly working FS
features are an order of magnitude better in ZFS than in BTRFS...

That's enough for me...

I've already converted 2 machines from BTRFS to ZFS since yesterday.

My netbook (now ZFS) boots to GDM in less than 30 seconds. My son's same
machine (except for the FS) takes 75 MORE seconds.

You get it.

Kind regards.

-- 
Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E
Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-02 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-02  8:24 Moving Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-04-02 17:04 ` Moving Roman Mamedov
2013-04-02 17:14   ` Swâmi Petaramesh [this message]
2013-04-02 17:19     ` Moving Harald Glatt
2013-04-03  8:47     ` [zfs-discuss] Moving Uncle Stoatwarbler
2013-04-03  9:14       ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-04-03 16:55     ` Moving Goffredo Baroncelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=515B120F.6000004@petaramesh.org \
    --to=swami@petaramesh.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rm@romanrm.ru \
    --cc=zfs-discuss@zfsonlinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox