Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9 v2] btrfs-progs: check if btrfs kernel module is loaded
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:14:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516BA8C4.4050800@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130412162325.GA18193@twin.jikos.cz>



On 04/13/2013 12:23 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:23:21PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>> diff --git a/cmds-device.c b/cmds-device.c
>> index a90fb67..0e1e6de 100644
>> --- a/cmds-device.c
>> +++ b/cmds-device.c
>> @@ -185,9 +185,10 @@ static const char * const cmd_scan_dev_usage[] = {
>>
>>   static int cmd_scan_dev(int argc, char **argv)
>>   {
>> -	int	i, fd, e;
>> +	int	i, fd = -1, e, ret = 0;
>>   	int	checklist = 1;
>>   	int	devstart = 1;
>> +	u64	flag_reg = 0ull;
>
> Do you need it to be u64? I see it's used only as a bool flag.

  Yes. more below..


>> +	if (is_btrfs_kernel_loaded())
>> +		flag_reg = BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER;
>
> 		flag_reg = 1;
>
> would work the same, so it should be fine with int.

  actually no. The intention was to use it as the
  parameter for btrfs_scan_block_devices, v2 fixes
  this. Thanks for the catch.

---
-			ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(BTRFS_SCAN_REGISTER);
+			ret = btrfs_scan_block_devices(flag_reg);
---


>>   	}
>>
>> +	printf("Scanning for Btrfs in\n");
> ...
>> -		printf("Scanning for Btrfs filesystems in '%s'\n", argv[i]);
>
> Please keep the word 'filesystem' in the message

  got this in v3

>> @@ -261,6 +287,10 @@ static int cmd_ready_dev(int argc, char **argv)
>>   	if (check_argc_min(argc, 2))
>>   		usage(cmd_ready_dev_usage);
>>
>> +	if (!is_btrfs_kernel_loaded()) {
>> +		fprintf(stderr, "btrfs kernel module is not loaded\n");
>> +		return 10;
>
> return 1 or -1

  got this into v3


>> --- a/mkfs.c
>> +++ b/mkfs.c
>> @@ -1420,6 +1420,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>>   	u64 flags;
>>   	int dev_cnt=0;
>>   	int saved_optind;
>> +	int flag_reg=1;
>
> ah, here it is an 'int'
>
>> --- a/utils.c
>> +++ b/utils.c
>> @@ -1016,6 +1016,33 @@ struct pending_dir {
>> +/*
>> + * return 1 if btrfs kernel is present
>> + * return 0 for not
>> + */
>> +int is_btrfs_kernel_loaded()
>> +{
>> +	FILE *pfs;
>> +	char fsname[100];
>> +	int ret = -1;
>> +	char line[100];
>> +
>> +	pfs = fopen("/proc/filesystems", "r");
>> +	if (pfs) {
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +		while (fgets(line, sizeof(line), pfs)) {
>> +			if (sscanf(line, "nodev %[^#\n]\n", fsname) == 1) continue;
>
> 			if (!strncmp("nodev", line, 5))
> 				continue;

got this into v3


>> +			if (sscanf(line, " %[^# \n]\n", fsname) != 1) continue;
>> +			if (!strcmp(fsname, "btrfs")) {
>> +				ret = 1;
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +		fclose(pfs);
>> +	}
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname)
>>   {
>>   	struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args args;
>> @@ -1023,6 +1050,11 @@ void btrfs_register_one_device(char *fname)
>>   	int ret;
>>   	int e;
>>
>> +	if (!is_btrfs_kernel_loaded()) {
>> +		fprintf(stderr, "btrfs kernel module is not loaded, "
>> +			"skipping device registration\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>>   	fd = open("/dev/btrfs-control", O_RDONLY);
>>   	if (fd < 0) {
>>   		fprintf(stderr, "failed to open /dev/btrfs-control "
>
> Otherwise ok.
> david
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-15  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-05  5:54 [PATCH 0/9] a bunch of miscellaneous bug fixes Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] [RESEND] btrfs-progs: root_item generation_v2 is out of sync after btrfsck Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] btrfs-progs: no pending balance is not an error Anand Jain
2013-04-12 15:57   ` David Sterba
2013-04-15  2:22     ` Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] btrfs-progs: mkfs should first check all disks before writing to a disk Anand Jain
2013-04-12 16:06   ` David Sterba
2013-04-15  6:47     ` Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] btrfs-progs: check if btrfs kernel module is loaded Anand Jain
2013-04-10  8:23   ` [PATCH 4/9 v2] " Anand Jain
2013-04-12 16:23     ` David Sterba
2013-04-15  7:14       ` Anand Jain [this message]
2013-04-05  5:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] [RESEND] btrfs-progs: delete unused function get_mountpt Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] btrfs-progs: mkfs stdout print to match chronology Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] btrfs-progs: cmd replace should check target-dev fully Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] btrfs-progs: btrfs-select-super output is confusing when it fails Anand Jain
2013-04-05  5:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] btrfs-progs: fix btrfs scrub start help Anand Jain
2013-04-05  9:05   ` Stefan Behrens
2013-04-08  2:09   ` [PATCH 9/9 v2] " Anand Jain
2013-04-08  2:20   ` [PATCH 9/9 v3] " Anand Jain
2013-04-11  9:58 ` [PATCH] btrfs-progs: avoid ioctl for multipath-dev with its non-multipath path Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38 ` [PATCH 00/11 v2] a bunch of miscellaneous bug fixes Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 01/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: root_item generation_v2 is out of sync after btrfsck Anand Jain
2013-04-21 23:09     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 02/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: no pending balance is not an error Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:44     ` [PATCH 02/11, v2] " Anand Jain
2013-04-16  4:58       ` [PATCH 02/11 v3] " Anand Jain
2013-04-15 16:21     ` [PATCH 02/11, RESEND] " David Sterba
2013-04-16  5:02       ` Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 03/11 v2] btrfs-progs: mkfs should first check all disks before writing to a disk Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 04/11 v2] btrfs-progs: cmd replace should check target-dev fully Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 05/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: mkfs stdout print to match chronology Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 06/11, v2] btrfs-progs: check if btrfs kernel module is loaded Anand Jain
2013-04-15  7:11     ` [PATCH 06/11 v3] " Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 07/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: delete unused function get_mountpt Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 08/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: btrfs-select-super output is confusing when it fails Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 09/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: fix btrfs scrub start help Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 10/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: avoid ioctl for multipath-dev with its non-multipath path Anand Jain
2013-04-15  6:38   ` [PATCH 11/11, RESEND] btrfs-progs: a copy of superblock is zero may not mean btrfs is not there Anand Jain
2013-04-16 12:15   ` [PATCH 00/11 v2] a bunch of miscellaneous bug fixes David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516BA8C4.4050800@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox