[PATCH RFC] Btrfs: fix confusing edquot happening case

[Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>]

Step to reproduce:
	mkfs.btrfs <disk>
	mount <disk> <mnt>
	dd if=/dev/zero of=/<mnt>/data bs=1M count=10
	sync
	btrfs quota enable <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup create 0/5 <mnt>
	btrfs qgroup limit 5M 0/5 <mnt>
	rm -f /<mnt>/data
	sync
	btrfs qgroup show <mnt>
	dd if=/dev/zero of=data bs=1M count=1

>From the perspective of users, qgroup's referenced or referenced

is negative,But user can not continue to write data! a workaround
way is to cast u64 to int64 when doing qgroup reservation.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
This confusing edquot may also happen after Jan's qgroup
rescan has been implemented.
---
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index b44124d..0178223 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -1523,14 +1523,14 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_reserve(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 num_bytes)
 		qg = (struct btrfs_qgroup *)(uintptr_t)unode->aux;
 
 		if ((qg->lim_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_RFER) &&
-		    qg->reserved + qg->rfer + num_bytes >
+		    qg->reserved + (signed long long)qg->rfer + num_bytes >
 		    qg->max_rfer) {
 			ret = -EDQUOT;
 			goto out;
 		}
 
 		if ((qg->lim_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_EXCL) &&
-		    qg->reserved + qg->excl + num_bytes >
+		    qg->reserved + (signed long long)qg->excl + num_bytes >
 		    qg->max_excl) {
 			ret = -EDQUOT;
 			goto out;
-- 
1.7.7.6