From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Dan McGrath <danmcgrath.ca@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Alexander Steffens <jan.steffens@gmail.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:01:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C324D.30200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK82gMGSGaNywR=RkEQcNbQiMW5-z2O3ZqkMwKtamEdRH+A7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/15/13 11:45 AM, Dan McGrath wrote:
> Jan,
>
> I got a chance to sit down and dig a little bit deeper into
> `fsck.xfs`. Here is what I discovered.
>
> The "(a|A|y|p)" options in the XFS script appear to be nothing more
> than the expected `fsck` options that imply automated checks (as is
> clearly implied by the use of AUTO). While I have yet to specifically
> test the capitalized "A", my guess is that it matches the "-A" options
> from fsck(8) for when the system is going through the fstab. The
> syntax itself appears to assume that the dev name is the last param
> (as indicated by the argc/$#, which gets eval'd into the DEV
> variable).
>
> After doing some tests with a hacked up version of the `fsck.xfs`
> script, it would appear that the generic `fsck` script calls each
> script in order and passes it some parameters to test, since if I pass
> `fsck` some random/btrfsck switches:
>
> # fsck --repair /dev/storage/lv_btrfs
>
> I get an error back from `fsck.ext4`:
>
> fsck from util-linux 2.20.1
> fsck.ext4: invalid option -- 'e'
2 things; from the fsck manpage:
fsck [-sAVRTMNP] [-C [fd]] [-t fstype] [filesys...] [--] [fs-specific-options]
so I think you need:
fsck -- --repair /dev/storage/lv_btrfs
But the other issues seems to be that fsck & blkid are autodetecting
the device as ext4, not btrfs; a separate issue.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-15 13:47 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: No-op when called as fsck.btrfsck Dan McGrath
2013-04-15 13:47 ` Dan McGrath
2013-04-15 14:03 ` Jan Alexander Steffens
2013-04-15 14:10 ` Dan McGrath
2013-04-15 16:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-04-15 16:45 ` Dan McGrath
2013-04-15 17:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-04-15 17:23 ` Dan McGrath
2013-04-15 18:59 ` Zach Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516C324D.30200@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=danmcgrath.ca@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.steffens@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox