Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ochi <ochi@arcor.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Activating space_cache after read-only snapshots without space_cache have been taken
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:28:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C9B43.7040605@arcor.de> (raw)

Hello everyone,

I've ran into problems with _very_ slow unmounting of my btrfs-formatted 
"backup" volume. I have a suspicion what might be the cause but maybe 
someone with more experience with the btrfs code could enlighten me 
whether it is actually correct.

The situation is the following: I have created a backup-volume to which 
I regularly rsync a backup of my system into a subvolume. After 
rsync'ing, I take a _read-only_ snapshot of that subvolume with a 
timestamp added to its name.

Now at the time I started using this backup volume, I was _not_ using 
the space_cache mount option and two read-only snapshots were taken 
during this time. Then I started using the space_cache option and 
continued doing snapshots.

A bit later, I started having very long lags when unmounting the backup 
volume (both during shutdown and when unmounting manually). I scrubbed 
and fsck'd the volume but this didn't show any errors. Defragmenting the 
root and subvolumes took a long time but didn't improve the situation much.

Now I started having the suspicion that maybe the space cache possibly 
couldn't be written to disk for the readonly subvolumes/snapshots that 
were created during the time when I wasn't using the space_cache option, 
forcing the cache to be rebuilt every time.

Clearing the cache didn't help. But when I deleted the two snapshots 
that I think were taken during the time without the mount option, the 
unmounting time seems to have improved considerably.

I will have to observe whether unmounting stays quick now but my 
question is whether it is possible that the read-only snapshots taken 
during the time when I wasn't using space_cache might actually have been 
the culprits.

Best,
Sebastian

             reply	other threads:[~2013-04-16  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-16  0:28 Ochi [this message]
2013-04-16  3:11 ` Activating space_cache after read-only snapshots without space_cache have been taken Liu Bo
2013-04-16  8:10   ` Sander
2013-04-16 11:35     ` Ochi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516C9B43.7040605@arcor.de \
    --to=ochi@arcor.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox