From: Ochi <ochi@arcor.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Activating space_cache after read-only snapshots without space_cache have been taken
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:28:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C9B43.7040605@arcor.de> (raw)
Hello everyone,
I've ran into problems with _very_ slow unmounting of my btrfs-formatted
"backup" volume. I have a suspicion what might be the cause but maybe
someone with more experience with the btrfs code could enlighten me
whether it is actually correct.
The situation is the following: I have created a backup-volume to which
I regularly rsync a backup of my system into a subvolume. After
rsync'ing, I take a _read-only_ snapshot of that subvolume with a
timestamp added to its name.
Now at the time I started using this backup volume, I was _not_ using
the space_cache mount option and two read-only snapshots were taken
during this time. Then I started using the space_cache option and
continued doing snapshots.
A bit later, I started having very long lags when unmounting the backup
volume (both during shutdown and when unmounting manually). I scrubbed
and fsck'd the volume but this didn't show any errors. Defragmenting the
root and subvolumes took a long time but didn't improve the situation much.
Now I started having the suspicion that maybe the space cache possibly
couldn't be written to disk for the readonly subvolumes/snapshots that
were created during the time when I wasn't using the space_cache option,
forcing the cache to be rebuilt every time.
Clearing the cache didn't help. But when I deleted the two snapshots
that I think were taken during the time without the mount option, the
unmounting time seems to have improved considerably.
I will have to observe whether unmounting stays quick now but my
question is whether it is possible that the read-only snapshots taken
during the time when I wasn't using space_cache might actually have been
the culprits.
Best,
Sebastian
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-16 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 0:28 Ochi [this message]
2013-04-16 3:11 ` Activating space_cache after read-only snapshots without space_cache have been taken Liu Bo
2013-04-16 8:10 ` Sander
2013-04-16 11:35 ` Ochi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516C9B43.7040605@arcor.de \
--to=ochi@arcor.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox