Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Papp Tamas <tompos@martos.bme.hu>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: oops at mount
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:56:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AC845A.6000600@martos.bme.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A74C5E.4030201@giantdisaster.de>

On 05/30/2013 02:55 PM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 08:32:35 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:17:06AM -0600, Papp Tamas wrote:
>>> hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm new on the list.
>>>
>>> System:
>>> Distributor ID:	Ubuntu
>>> Description:	Ubuntu 13.04
>>> Release:	13.04
>>> Codename:	raring
>>>
>>> Linux ctu 3.8.0-19-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 1 16:35:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> The symptom is the same with Saucy 3.9 kernel.
>>
>> Can you try btrfs-next
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git
>>
>> if it's still not fixed please file a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and make sure
>> the component is set to btrfs.  Thanks,
>
> Papp is using an Intel X18-M/X25-M/X25-V G2 SSD. At least with an Intel
> X25 SSD that identifies itself with "INTEL SSDSA2M080" and on one with
> the ID "INTEL SSDSA2M040", I've tested whether they honor the flush
> request. And these two SSDs don't do so, they ignore it. If you cut the
> power after a flush request completes, the data that was written before
> the flush request is gone, the write cache was _not_ flushed.
>
> You can only disable the write cache during/after every boot "hdparm -W
> 0 /dev/sd..." (which reduces the SSDs write speed to about 4 MB/s), or
> avoid such SSDs, or prepare to restore from backup occasionally.

Basically it means it's not safe to use this SSD?
I used it for 2 years with ext4 without any issue, before I switched to btrfs (on the root 
partition). In the meantime btrfs also was quite stable on my /data partition.

After I reinstalled thr system with btrfs, this issue happened two times.
But anyway, I thought cow should be able to handle these kind of issues by design. Am I wrong?


Thanks,
tamas


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-30 11:17 oops at mount Papp Tamas
2013-05-30 12:32 ` Josef Bacik
2013-05-30 12:55   ` Stefan Behrens
2013-05-30 14:03     ` Chris Mason
2013-05-30 14:59       ` Stefan Behrens
2013-05-30 16:37         ` Chris Mason
2013-06-03 11:56     ` Papp Tamas [this message]
2013-06-03 12:13       ` Hugo Mills
2013-05-31 14:55   ` Papp Tamas
2013-05-30 20:08 ` Stefan Behrens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51AC845A.6000600@martos.bme.hu \
    --to=tompos@martos.bme.hu \
    --cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox