From: Papp Tamas <tompos@martos.bme.hu>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: oops at mount
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:56:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AC845A.6000600@martos.bme.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A74C5E.4030201@giantdisaster.de>
On 05/30/2013 02:55 PM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 08:32:35 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:17:06AM -0600, Papp Tamas wrote:
>>> hi All,
>>>
>>> I'm new on the list.
>>>
>>> System:
>>> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
>>> Description: Ubuntu 13.04
>>> Release: 13.04
>>> Codename: raring
>>>
>>> Linux ctu 3.8.0-19-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 1 16:35:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>> The symptom is the same with Saucy 3.9 kernel.
>>
>> Can you try btrfs-next
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next.git
>>
>> if it's still not fixed please file a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and make sure
>> the component is set to btrfs. Thanks,
>
> Papp is using an Intel X18-M/X25-M/X25-V G2 SSD. At least with an Intel
> X25 SSD that identifies itself with "INTEL SSDSA2M080" and on one with
> the ID "INTEL SSDSA2M040", I've tested whether they honor the flush
> request. And these two SSDs don't do so, they ignore it. If you cut the
> power after a flush request completes, the data that was written before
> the flush request is gone, the write cache was _not_ flushed.
>
> You can only disable the write cache during/after every boot "hdparm -W
> 0 /dev/sd..." (which reduces the SSDs write speed to about 4 MB/s), or
> avoid such SSDs, or prepare to restore from backup occasionally.
Basically it means it's not safe to use this SSD?
I used it for 2 years with ext4 without any issue, before I switched to btrfs (on the root
partition). In the meantime btrfs also was quite stable on my /data partition.
After I reinstalled thr system with btrfs, this issue happened two times.
But anyway, I thought cow should be able to handle these kind of issues by design. Am I wrong?
Thanks,
tamas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 11:17 oops at mount Papp Tamas
2013-05-30 12:32 ` Josef Bacik
2013-05-30 12:55 ` Stefan Behrens
2013-05-30 14:03 ` Chris Mason
2013-05-30 14:59 ` Stefan Behrens
2013-05-30 16:37 ` Chris Mason
2013-06-03 11:56 ` Papp Tamas [this message]
2013-06-03 12:13 ` Hugo Mills
2013-05-31 14:55 ` Papp Tamas
2013-05-30 20:08 ` Stefan Behrens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AC845A.6000600@martos.bme.hu \
--to=tompos@martos.bme.hu \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox