From: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clmason@fusionio.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:53:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AEE07E.6070301@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130605020939.GC27240@logfs.org>
On 05.06.2013 04:09, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Tue, 4 June 2013 14:44:35 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
>>
>> Or while_list_drain?
I'm fine with while_list_drain, although a name starting with list_
like all other list macros would be nice. How about just list_drain?
The next question is where to put it in the header so that anyone
doing list cleanup stumbles upon it. Maybe directly below list_del?
-Arne
>
> Not sure if the silence is approval or lack of interest, but a new set
> of patches is posted. By playing around with the implementation a
> bit, I have actually found a variant that makes the object code
> shrink. Not one variant gave same-size object code. There's compiler
> optimization for you.
>
> Jörn
>
> --
> Money can buy bandwidth, but latency is forever.
> -- John R. Mashey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-03 17:28 [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del Joern Engel
2013-06-03 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] list: add list_for_each_entry_del Joern Engel
2013-06-06 19:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-06 18:12 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-06 19:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-07 16:36 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-07 18:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-07 18:48 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-08 0:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-03 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use list_for_each_entry_del Joern Engel
2013-06-03 18:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del Jörn Engel
2013-06-03 20:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-06-03 19:36 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-03 19:55 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-04 14:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-06-04 14:53 ` Chris Mason
2013-06-04 20:09 ` Arne Jansen
2013-06-04 18:44 ` Jörn Engel
2013-06-05 2:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] list: add while_list_drain_entry Jörn Engel
2013-06-05 14:32 ` David Sterba
2013-06-05 2:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use while_list_drain_entry Jörn Engel
2013-06-05 2:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del Jörn Engel
2013-06-05 6:53 ` Arne Jansen [this message]
2013-06-05 14:25 ` David Sterba
2013-07-05 20:41 ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-05 20:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] list: add list_del_each_entry Jörn Engel
2013-07-05 22:38 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-07-15 17:35 ` Jörn Engel
2013-07-05 20:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use list_del_each_entry Jörn Engel
2013-07-08 4:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] introduce list_for_each_entry_del Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AEE07E.6070301@gmx.net \
--to=sensille@gmx.net \
--cc=clmason@fusionio.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).