From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:21182 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932403Ab3FMDwa (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:52:30 -0400 Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5D3qRSr032270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:52:27 GMT Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5D3qQNN021716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:52:26 GMT Received: from abhmt101.oracle.com (abhmt101.oracle.com [141.146.116.53]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5D3qQDJ021713 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 03:52:26 GMT Message-ID: <51B942E3.8000701@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:56:19 +0800 From: Anand Jain MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-btrfs Subject: btrfs-progs and btrfs code similar why ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Per wiki an idea seems to maintain same code (probably as much as possible) between btrfs-progs and btrfs There must have been a/few critical advantage, but what are they ? Thanks, Anand