From: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: mark static & remove unused from non-kernel code
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:54:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5201FD1D.7030200@giantdisaster.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5201C3CC.8000303@redhat.com>
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 22:49:32 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/6/13 8:05 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Mark many functions as static, and remove any resulting dead code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
>> ---
> ...
>
> Actually, what the heck was this (note, this patch was against kdave's integration tree):
>
>> diff --git a/send-utils.c b/send-utils.c
>> index 874f8a5..3d562a4 100644
>> --- a/send-utils.c
>> +++ b/send-utils.c
>> @@ -255,15 +255,6 @@ static int btrfs_subvolid_resolve_sub(int fd, char *path, size_t *path_len,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -void subvol_uuid_search_add(struct subvol_uuid_search *s,
>> - struct subvol_info *si)
>> -{
>> - if (si) {
>> - free(si->path);
>> - free(si);
>> - }
>> -}
>> -
>
> That code above came into being with "[PATCH v4 3/5] Btrfs-progs: use UUID tree for send/receive" -
>
> void subvol_uuid_search_add(struct subvol_uuid_search *s,
> struct subvol_info *si)
> {
> - int cnt;
> -
> - tree_insert(&s->root_id_subvols, si, subvol_search_by_root_id);
> - tree_insert(&s->path_subvols, si, subvol_search_by_path);
> -
> - cnt = count_bytes(si->uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE, 0);
> - if (cnt != BTRFS_UUID_SIZE)
> - tree_insert(&s->local_subvols, si, subvol_search_by_uuid);
> - cnt = count_bytes(si->received_uuid, BTRFS_UUID_SIZE, 0);
> - if (cnt != BTRFS_UUID_SIZE)
> - tree_insert(&s->received_subvols, si,
> - subvol_search_by_received_uuid);
> + if (si) {
> + free(si->path);
> + free(si);
> + }
> }
>
> is that, um, really as intended, or did something get misapplied somewhere?
That was as intended. subvol_uuid_search_add() was not needed anymore
after the UUID tree patch. But it's part of the btrfs library interface
which I didn't want to break.
Before the UUID tree patch, the send/receive code was creating a
database (on the heap) of UUIDs, subvols and paths on each invocation.
The ..._add() function was part of that code. This database building
code was completely removed and replaced by code that uses the
tree-search ioctl (this was possible after the addition of the UUID tree
to the on-disk filesystem).
But subvol_uuid_search_add() is one of the exported btrfslib functions,
therefore I tried to stay compatible and to not break the interface.
To add a BTRFSLIB_VERSION define was proposed some time ago which is
updated with every interface change. I support this idea.
First thing I would like to change in the interface would be to add a
"btrfs_" prefix to all exported symbols. Unfortunately this is a 30k+
lines patch, I wrote a tiny sed script for it some time ago and this
huge patch was the result which I then throw away afterwards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 1:01 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs-progs: more statics & removals Eric Sandeen
2013-08-07 1:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: mark static & remove unused from shared kernel code Eric Sandeen
2013-08-07 1:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: mark static & remove unused from non-kernel code Eric Sandeen
2013-08-07 3:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-07 7:54 ` Stefan Behrens [this message]
2013-08-07 15:17 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-09 14:10 ` David Sterba
2013-08-09 14:39 ` Stefan Behrens
2013-08-09 20:20 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2013-08-09 22:48 ` David Sterba
2013-08-09 23:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-09 23:25 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5201FD1D.7030200@giantdisaster.de \
--to=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).