From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/003: regression test for subvol delete
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:37:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520947A4.8090708@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376336447-20684-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>
On 8/12/13 2:40 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> We were allowing users to delete their default subvolume, which is problematic.
> This test is a regression test to make sure we don't let that happen in the
> future. Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/003 | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/btrfs/003.out | 2 +
> tests/btrfs/group | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/003
> create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/003.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/003 b/tests/btrfs/003
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..775322a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/003
> @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. btrfs/003
> +#
> +# Regression test to make sure we can't delete the default subvol
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2013 Fusion IO. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +
> +status=1 # failure is the default!
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> + rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# This will be set to subvolid 256. If this ever changes in the future for
> +# whatever reason we'll have to pull the subvolid out of the subvol list command
> +# but since it's a newly mkfs'ed fs we should be fine with this.
Is it that hard to just do it right the first time? I'd rather see
it extracted properly... (perhaps with a helper?)
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG sub create $SCRATCH_MNT/newvol >> $seqres.full 2>&1 \
> + || _fail "couldnt create subvol"
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG sub set-default 256 $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1 \
> + || _fail "couldn't set default"
you spelled "couldn't" with and without a ' - while you're at it. ;)
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG sub delete $SCRATCH_MNT/newvol >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +[ $? -eq 0 ] && _fail "delete succeeded, should have failed"
Maybe umount & mount since that was the originally detected failure
(rather than simply relying on the exit status?)
-Eric
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +status=0 ; exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/003.out b/tests/btrfs/003.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6895fc8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/003.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 003
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 0733a1d..44b2f8e 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #
> 001 auto quick
> 002 auto quick
> +003 auto quick
> 254 auto quick
> 264 auto
> 265 auto
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 19:40 [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/003: regression test for subvol delete Josef Bacik
2013-08-12 20:37 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520947A4.8090708@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).