From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:41122 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933030Ab3HNUA1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: <520BE1FF.10403@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:01:03 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josef Bacik CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/002, another send regression test References: <1376334802-18960-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> In-Reply-To: <1376334802-18960-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/12/2013 02:13 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > This is a regression test for a problem we had where we'd assume we had created > a directory if it only had subvols inside of it. This was happening because > subvols would have lower inode numbers than our current send progress because > their inode numbers are based off of a different counter. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik > --- > tests/btrfs/002 | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/btrfs/002.out | 2 + > tests/btrfs/group | 1 + > 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/002 > create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/002.out Thanks for the patch Josef, this has been committed: commit 6ef348f857ee2912b034ab0148bab7cdb814c0e7 Author: Josef Bacik Date: Mon Aug 12 19:13:22 2013 +0000 xfstests: btrfs/008, another send regression test This is a regression test for a problem we had where we'd assume we had created a directory if it only had subvols inside of it. This was happening because subvols would have lower inode numbers than our current send progress because their inode numbers are based off of a different counter. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston [rjohnston: renumbered test from 002 to 008]