From: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: eliminate the exceptional root_tree refs=0
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:36:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52299420.4070702@giantdisaster.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52294720.8050906@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 11:08:16 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> On thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:58:43 +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote:
>> The fact that btrfs_root_refs() returned 0 for the tree_root caused
>> bugs in the past, therefore it is set to 1 with this patch and
>> (hopefully) all affected code is adapted to this change.
>>
>> I verified this change by temporarily adding WARN_ON() checks
>> everywhere where btrfs_root_refs() is used, checking whether the
>> logic of the code is changed by btrfs_root_refs() returning 1
>> instead of 0 for root->root_key.objectid == BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID.
>> With these added checks, I ran the xfstests './check -g auto'.
>>
>> The two roots chunk_root and log_root_tree that are only referenced
>> by the superblock and the log_roots below the log_root_tree still
>> have btrfs_root_refs() == 0, only the tree_root is changed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 +
>> fs/btrfs/inode-map.c | 3 +--
>> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> index fa8b2c6..ffc3e43 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> @@ -2667,6 +2667,7 @@ retry_root_backup:
>>
>> btrfs_set_root_node(&tree_root->root_item, tree_root->node);
>> tree_root->commit_root = btrfs_root_node(tree_root);
>> + btrfs_set_root_refs(&tree_root->root_item, 1);
>>
>> location.objectid = BTRFS_EXTENT_TREE_OBJECTID;
>> location.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
>> index 2c66ddb..d11e1c6 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
>> @@ -412,8 +412,7 @@ int btrfs_save_ino_cache(struct btrfs_root *root,
>> return 0;
>>
>> /* Don't save inode cache if we are deleting this root */
>> - if (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0 &&
>> - root != root->fs_info->tree_root)
>> + if (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0)
>> return 0;
>>
>> if (!btrfs_test_opt(root, INODE_MAP_CACHE))
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> index 26992ee..7d0ef55 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> @@ -4472,8 +4472,10 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
>> trace_btrfs_inode_evict(inode);
>>
>> truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
>> - if (inode->i_nlink && (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) != 0 ||
>> - btrfs_is_free_space_inode(inode)))
>> + if (inode->i_nlink &&
>> + ((btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) != 0 &&
>> + root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID) ||
>> + btrfs_is_free_space_inode(inode)))
>
> if (inode->i_nlink && btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item)) {
> }
>
> is OK, because with this patch, the refs of the free space inodes' root(tree root)
> should be 1. For the ino cache inodes' root(fs/file root), if the root is dead,
> we can drop the ino cache inode safely. And if the root is not dead, the refs
> should be > 0, we will skip the drop.
Thank you for your comments!
It needs to be like this or it doesn't work. The code that you propose
changes the logic when close_ctree() calls iput(fs_info->btree_inode).
The if-condition in btrfs_evict_inode() used to be false for
fs_info->btree_inode before this patch and would become true. And the
system locks up in the middle of a './check -g auto' run with page cache
issues and I have also seen the OOM killer killing the entire test box.
But maybe you can propose how to make this if-statement more explicit
and readable, maybe by explicitly checking for inode ==
fs_info->btree_inode?
>> goto no_delete;
>>
>> if (is_bad_inode(inode)) {
>> @@ -4490,7 +4492,8 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
>> }
>>
>> if (inode->i_nlink > 0) {
>> - BUG_ON(btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) != 0);
>> + BUG_ON(btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) != 0 &&
>> + root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_ROOT_TREE_OBJECTID);
>
> This change is unnecessary because the refs of the root tree is 1 now.
Because of the thing above, this is needed.
>
>> goto no_delete;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -4731,14 +4734,7 @@ static void inode_tree_del(struct inode *inode)
>> }
>> spin_unlock(&root->inode_lock);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * Free space cache has inodes in the tree root, but the tree root has a
>> - * root_refs of 0, so this could end up dropping the tree root as a
>> - * snapshot, so we need the extra !root->fs_info->tree_root check to
>> - * make sure we don't drop it.
>> - */
>> - if (empty && btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0 &&
>> - root != root->fs_info->tree_root) {
>> + if (empty && btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0) {
>> synchronize_srcu(&root->fs_info->subvol_srcu);
>> spin_lock(&root->inode_lock);
>> empty = RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&root->inode_tree);
>> @@ -7872,8 +7868,7 @@ int btrfs_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
>> return 1;
>>
>> /* the snap/subvol tree is on deleting */
>> - if (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0 &&
>> - root != root->fs_info->tree_root)
>> + if (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0)
>> return 1;
>> else
>> return generic_drop_inode(inode);
>
> The others is OK.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-06 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 14:58 [PATCH] Btrfs: eliminate the exceptional root_tree refs=0 Stefan Behrens
2013-09-06 3:08 ` Miao Xie
2013-09-06 8:36 ` Stefan Behrens [this message]
2013-09-09 10:10 ` Miao Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52299420.4070702@giantdisaster.de \
--to=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).