From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:25918 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752255Ab3IVS2P (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 14:28:15 -0400 Message-ID: <523F36B1.8080701@linux.intel.com> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:28:01 -0700 From: Saul Wold MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Issue building a file based rootfs image with mkfs.btrfs References: <523B4036.7030204@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <523B4036.7030204@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/19/2013 11:19 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > > Hi there, > > I am attempting to build a rootfs image from an existing rootfs > directory tree. I am using the 0.20 @ 194aa4a of Chris's git repo. > > The couple problem I saw was that the target image file needed to exist, > although I think I can patch that then the FS size was much larger than > the actual size, I tracked this to the usage of ftw not accounting for > symlinks, I have a patch for that which I will send once I finish > getting the other issues resolved. > > Next issue I hit was an assertion failure after getting "not enough free > space" message: > > not enough free space > add_file_items failed > unable to traverse_directory > Making image is aborted. > mkfs.btrfs: mkfs.c:1542: main: Assertion `!(ret)' failed. > > I am kind of stuck on this one, took it as far as I can right now. Would > I be better off dropping back to 0.19 or can we move forward fixing this? > Anybody have any ideas on this? I can reproduce this at will on Fedora 19 (with btrfs-progs-0.20), Ubuntu 12.10 (with btrfs-profs-0.19) and with HEAD from Chris's repo above (is this the right place these days)? Thanks your your help. Sau! > Thanks >