From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: create helper function to use lblkid to scan for btrfs disks
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 18:21:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52528B1A.5030402@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131001120352.GB18291@twin.jikos.cz>
>>> Following this patch the idea is to use lblkid to scan
>>> for the btrfs disks by default which means we don't
>>> use BTRFS_SCAN_PROC any more.
>>
>> Firstly, i would like to know if we will get any different results between scanning
>> /proc/partions and using lbkid.
>
> I take blkid as a more authoritative source, /proc/partitions was a
> workaround to avoid scanning the whole /dev directory.
>
>> If not, why we can use liblkid totally,since this is more simple.
>
> Agreed, blkid by default and --all-devices as a last resort fallback.
compiled using BTRFS_SCAN_LBLKID as default.
---
--- a/cmds-filesystem.c
+++ b/cmds-filesystem.c
@@ -402,7 +402,8 @@ static int cmd_show(int argc, char **argv)
struct list_head *cur_uuid;
char *search = NULL;
int ret;
- int where = BTRFS_SCAN_PROC;
+ int where = BTRFS_SCAN_LBLKID;
int type = 0;
while (1) {
------
# btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: c114c6ce-58a1-4e2c-839e-b53c5ba5ba75
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 756.00KiB
devid 1 size 1.10GiB used 324.00MiB path /dev/mapper/mpathg
---
recompiled to use BTRFS_SCAN_PROC as in original.
---
# btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: c114c6ce-58a1-4e2c-839e-b53c5ba5ba75
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 36.00KiB
devid 1 size 1.10GiB used 148.62MiB path /dev/dm-2
---
> The proc workaround can go away.
The other choice is to use both, 'BTRFS_SCAN_PROC | BTRFS_SCAN_DEV'
for --all-devices option. in that way proc-way will still be in there.
Thanks, Anand
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-07 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 15:45 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: create helper function to use lblkid to scan for btrfs disks Anand Jain
2013-09-27 16:10 ` Anand Jain
2013-09-27 16:21 ` Wang Shilong
2013-10-01 12:03 ` David Sterba
2013-10-07 10:21 ` Anand Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52528B1A.5030402@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).