From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Mixed and raid [was Re: BUG: btrfsRe: Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience?]
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5285CDA9.3020208@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$afa55$861f820e$b8e2b567$4f5d324c@cox.net>
On 2013-11-15 08:12, Duncan wrote:
> Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Thu, 14 Nov 2013 22:21:22 +0100 as
> excerpted:
>
>> after some tests and looking at the code I discovered that the current
>> mkfs.btrfs doesn't allow any raid profile other than SINGLE for data and
>> meta-data when the mixed metadata/data group is enabled.
>
> That'd be a big problem for me, here, as I run a separate sub-GiB (640
> MiB) btrfs filesystem /var/log, in data+metadata raid1 mode. (The
> mountpoint is actually /lg, with /var/log a symlink pointing at it.)
>
[...]
>
> You're saying data+metadata DUP wouldn't be possible here either, which
> would make me pretty unhappy too.
The problem should be in mkfs.btrfs not in the btrfs kernel code. So if
the filesystem was created, there should be not problem.
>
> Fortunately I did those mkfs.btrfs on an earlier btrfs-tools so wasn't
> affected by this bug, but bug I would indeed call it, for sure!
Anand posted a patch few hours ago (which worked for me). I think that
this bug could be addressed quickly.
BR
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-14 11:02 Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience? Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-14 17:18 ` George Mitchell
2013-11-14 17:35 ` Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-14 19:59 ` Kyle Gates
2013-11-15 1:58 ` George Mitchell
2013-11-14 18:22 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-14 20:47 ` BUG: btrfsRe: " Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-14 21:21 ` Mixed and raid [was Re: BUG: btrfsRe: Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience?] Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-11-15 4:44 ` Anand Jain
2013-11-15 10:35 ` Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-15 10:36 ` Lutz Vieweg
2013-11-15 7:12 ` Duncan
2013-11-15 7:30 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2013-11-15 9:37 ` Duncan
2013-11-14 21:22 ` BUG: btrfsRe: Does btrfs "raid1" actually provide any resilience? Chris Murphy
2013-11-14 21:31 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5285CDA9.3020208@libero.it \
--to=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).