From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net ([65.41.216.221]:26157 "EHLO
	greer.hardwarefreak.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755278Ab3KVW2M (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <528FDA80.1030508@hardwarefreak.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:28:16 -0600
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Williams <jwilliams4200@gmail.com>
CC: James Plank <plank@cs.utk.edu>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>,
        Andrea Mazzoleni <amadvance@gmail.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Linux RAID Mailing List <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
        Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>,
        David Smith <creamyfish@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Triple parity and beyond
References: <CAGKKSfWO4qTZsbd-=10cKc7=O7hTCVceMVQvCTJcUh1Z_gW04Q@mail.gmail.com>	<528A90B7.5010905@zytor.com>	<CAGKKSfWXv4vzVDz-wOm=wC=oU3uM3t7hnp39CoXFkOjyjN_knA@mail.gmail.com>	<528AA1EB.3010909@zytor.com>	<CAGKKSfVEMuRYf-L5Nfy0Q4SHKcks0VhPJkj73vy+krsNhSkruA@mail.gmail.com>	<528BCA2D.5010500@redhat.com>	<73BEB41F-0FAC-4108-BEA9-DB6D921F6F55@cs.utk.edu>	<528D61C5.70902@hardwarefreak.com>	<CAJBj3vf7Ot2oUkk6LtkWRouFqrSCKecz0yD4Ds5UGT1BL1ds5A@mail.gmail.com>	<528DADB1.8010604@hardwarefreak.com>	<CAJBj3vcE07FYi-+xMxwd+u6dVfFU0ryU=j+ekmG8p=cgMhU74g@mail.gmail.com>	<528E8FEC.2070204@hardwarefreak.com>	<CAJBj3veHCTbGstLoUec67sMWuyHQMmZNY4A6bwcb+HQOgjJ_Ew@mail.gmail.com>	<528F2575.80605@hardwarefreak.com> <CAJBj3vft=Bnz1Hb-P96JZmfJNSE_m-S4SJ7nY3nev33SvCOmgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJBj3vft=Bnz1Hb-P96JZmfJNSE_m-S4SJ7nY3nev33SvCOmgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 11/22/2013 9:01 AM, John Williams wrote:
<snip>

> I see no advantage of RAID 15, and several disadvantages.

Of course not, just as I sated previously.

On 11/22/2013 2:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

> Parity users who currently shun RAID 10 for this reason will also
> shun this "RAID 15".

With that I'll thank you for your input from the pure parity
perspective, and end our discussion.  Any further exchange would be
pointless.

-- 
Stan