From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Btrfs: introduce the delayed inode ref deletion for the single link inode
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:19:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AB257B.5070700@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386929381-3483-6-git-send-email-miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 12/13/2013 05:09 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
> The inode reference item is close to inode item, so we insert it simultaneously
> with the inode item insertion when we create a file/directory.. In fact, we also
> can handle the inode reference deletion by the same way. So we made this patch to
> introduce the delayed inode reference deletion for the single link inode(At most
> case, the file doesn't has hard link, so we don't take the hard link into account).
>
> This function is based on the delayed inode mechanism. After applying this patch,
> we can reduce the time of the file/directory deletion by ~10%.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 3 ++
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.h | 2 +
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
> index ac0b39d..661b0ac 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
> */
> u64 index_cnt;
>
> + /* Cache the directory index number to speed the dir/file remove */
> + u64 dir_index;
> +
> /* the fsync log has some corner cases that mean we have to check
> * directories to see if any unlinks have been done before
> * the directory was logged. See tree-log.c for all the
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> index 979db56..8671d980 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
> @@ -1015,6 +1015,18 @@ static void btrfs_release_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
> }
> }
>
> +static void btrfs_release_delayed_iref(struct btrfs_delayed_node *delayed_node)
> +{
> + struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!delayed_node->root);
Use assert(), not BUG_ON().
> + clear_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &delayed_node->flags);
> + delayed_node->count--;
> +
> + delayed_root = delayed_node->root->fs_info->delayed_root;
> + finish_one_item(delayed_root);
> +}
> +
> static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_root *root,
> struct btrfs_path *path,
> @@ -1023,13 +1035,19 @@ static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> struct btrfs_key key;
> struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item;
> struct extent_buffer *leaf;
> + int mod;
> int ret;
>
> key.objectid = node->inode_id;
> btrfs_set_key_type(&key, BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY);
> key.offset = 0;
>
> - ret = btrfs_lookup_inode(trans, root, path, &key, 1);
> + if (test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &node->flags))
> + mod = -1;
> + else
> + mod = 1;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_lookup_inode(trans, root, path, &key, mod);
> if (ret > 0) {
> btrfs_release_path(path);
> return -ENOENT;
> @@ -1037,19 +1055,58 @@ static int __btrfs_update_delayed_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - btrfs_unlock_up_safe(path, 1);
> leaf = path->nodes[0];
> inode_item = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0],
> struct btrfs_inode_item);
> write_extent_buffer(leaf, &node->inode_item, (unsigned long)inode_item,
> sizeof(struct btrfs_inode_item));
> btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf);
> - btrfs_release_path(path);
>
> + if (!test_bit(BTRFS_DELAYED_NODE_DEL_IREF, &node->flags))
> + goto no_iref;
> +
> + path->slots[0]++;
> + if (path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf))
> + goto search;
> +again:
> + btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
> + if (key.objectid != node->inode_id)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (key.type != BTRFS_INODE_REF_KEY &&
> + key.type != BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> + * Delayed iref deletion is for the inode who has only one link,
> + * so there is only one iref. The case that several irefs are
> + * in the same item doesn't exist.
> + */
> + btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path);
> +out:
> + btrfs_release_delayed_iref(node);
> +no_iref:
> + btrfs_release_path(path);
> +err_out:
> btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata(root, node);
> btrfs_release_delayed_inode(node);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> +
> +search:
> + btrfs_release_path(path);
> +
> + btrfs_set_key_type(&key, BTRFS_INODE_EXTREF_KEY);
> + key.offset = -1;
> + ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_out;
> + BUG_ON(!ret);
Same here. Thanks,
Josef
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-13 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 10:09 [PATCH 1/6] Btrfs: remove residual code in delayed inode async helper Miao Xie
2013-12-13 10:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] Btrfs: don't run delayed nodes again after all nodes flush Miao Xie
2013-12-13 10:09 ` [PATCH 3/6] Btrfs: cleanup code of btrfs_balance_delayed_items() Miao Xie
2013-12-13 10:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] Btrfs: remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta() Miao Xie
2013-12-16 15:00 ` David Sterba
2013-12-13 10:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] Btrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node Miao Xie
2013-12-13 10:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] Btrfs: introduce the delayed inode ref deletion for the single link inode Miao Xie
2013-12-13 15:19 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AB257B.5070700@fb.com \
--to=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).