linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>,
	<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix tree mod logging
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:06:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AB68DD.6070508@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386963698-17766-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@gmail.com>


On 12/13/2013 02:41 PM, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
> While running the test btrfs/004 from xfstests in a loop, it failed
> about 1 time out of 20 runs in my desktop. The failure happend in
> the backref walking part of the test, and the test's error message was
> like this:
>
>    btrfs/004 93s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad)
>        --- tests/btrfs/004.out	2013-11-26 18:25:29.263333714 +0000
>        +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad	2013-12-10 15:25:10.327518516 +0000
>        @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
>         QA output created by 004
>         *** test backref walking
>        -*** done
>        +unexpected output from
>        +	/home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
>        +expected inum: 405, expected address: 454656, file: /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/d6/d3d/d156/fce, got:
>        +
>         ...
>         (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/004.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>    Ran: btrfs/004
>    Failures: btrfs/004
>    Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> But immediately after the test finished, the btrfs inspect-internal command
> returned the expected output:
>
>    $ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
>    inode 405 offset 454656 root 258
>    inode 405 offset 454656 root 5
>
> It turned out this was because the btrfs_search_old_slot() calls performed
> during backref walking (backref.c:__resolve_indirect_ref) were not finding
> anything. The reason for this turned out to be that the tree mod logging
> code was not logging some node multi-step operations atomically, therefore
> btrfs_search_old_slot() callers iterated often over an incomplete tree that
> wasn't fully consistent with any tree state from the past. Besides missing
> items, this often (but not always) resulted in -EIO errors during old slot
> searches, reported in dmesg like this:
>
> [ 4299.933936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 4299.933949] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 23190 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1343 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]()
> [ 4299.933950] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep rfcomm bluetooth parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc joydev snd_hda_codec_h
> [ 4299.933977] CPU: 0 PID: 23190 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
> [ 4299.933978] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
> [ 4299.933979]  000000000000053f ffff8806f3fd98f8 ffffffff8176d284 0000000000000007
> [ 4299.933982]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f3fd9938 ffffffff8104a81c ffff880659c64b70
> [ 4299.933984]  ffff880659c643d0 ffff8806599233d8 ffff880701e2e938 0000160000000000
> [ 4299.933987] Call Trace:
> [ 4299.933991]  [<ffffffff8176d284>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
> [ 4299.933994]  [<ffffffff8104a81c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
> [ 4299.933997]  [<ffffffff8104a86a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [ 4299.934003]  [<ffffffffa065d3bb>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934005]  [<ffffffff81775f3b>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2b/0x50
> [ 4299.934010]  [<ffffffffa0655001>] ? __tree_mod_log_search+0x81/0xc0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934019]  [<ffffffffa06dd9b0>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x130/0x5f0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934027]  [<ffffffffa06a21f1>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934034]  [<ffffffffa06de39c>] find_parent_nodes+0x1fc/0xe40 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934042]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934048]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934056]  [<ffffffffa06df980>] iterate_extent_inodes+0xe0/0x250 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934058]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
> [ 4299.934065]  [<ffffffffa06dfb82>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934071]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934078]  [<ffffffffa06b7015>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf65/0x1f60 [btrfs]
> [ 4299.934080]  [<ffffffff811658b8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x278/0xb00
> [ 4299.934083]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
> [ 4299.934085]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
> [ 4299.934088]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
> [ 4299.934090]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
> [ 4299.934093]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
> [ 4299.934096]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
> [ 4299.934098]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
> [ 4299.934100]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
> [ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 4299.934104] ---[ end trace 48f0cfc902491414 ]---
> [ 4299.934378] btrfs bad fsid on block 0
>
> These tree mod log operations that must be performed atomically, tree_mod_log_free_eb,
> tree_mod_log_eb_copy, tree_mod_log_insert_root and tree_mod_log_insert_move, used to
> be performed atomically before the following commit:
>
>    c8cc6341653721b54760480b0d0d9b5f09b46741
>    (Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC for the tree mod log allocations)
>
> That change removed the atomicity of such operations. This patch restores the
> atomicity while still not doing the GFP_ATOMIC allocations of tree_mod_elem
> structures, so it has to do the allocations using GFP_NOFS before acquiring
> the mod log lock.
>
> This issue has been experienced by several users recently, such as for example:
>
>    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg28574.html
>
> After running the btrfs/004 test for 679 consecutive iterations with this
> patch applied, I didn't ran into the issue anymore.

Thanks for tracking this down, just some return error problems below.

>
> Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/ctree.c |  266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 204 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> index 59664f6..e99e5f6 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> @@ -474,6 +474,8 @@ void btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>    * the index is the shifted logical of the *new* root node for root replace
>    * operations, or the shifted logical of the affected block for all other
>    * operations.
> + *
> + * Note: must be called with write lock (tree_mod_log_write_lock).
>    */
>   static noinline int
>   __tree_mod_log_insert(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct tree_mod_elem *tm)
> @@ -486,20 +488,6 @@ __tree_mod_log_insert(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct tree_mod_elem *tm)
>   
>   	BUG_ON(!tm);
>   
> -	tree_mod_log_write_lock(fs_info);
> -	if (list_empty(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_list)) {
> -		tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
> -		/*
> -		 * Ok we no longer care about logging modifications, free up tm
> -		 * and return 0.  Any callers shouldn't be using tm after
> -		 * calling tree_mod_log_insert, but if they do we can just
> -		 * change this to return a special error code to let the callers
> -		 * do their own thing.
> -		 */
> -		kfree(tm);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>   	spin_lock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
>   	tm->seq = btrfs_inc_tree_mod_seq_minor(fs_info);
>   	spin_unlock(&fs_info->tree_mod_seq_lock);
> @@ -527,7 +515,6 @@ __tree_mod_log_insert(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct tree_mod_elem *tm)
>   	rb_link_node(&tm->node, parent, new);
>   	rb_insert_color(&tm->node, tm_root);
>   out:
> -	tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> @@ -544,19 +531,38 @@ static inline int tree_mod_dont_log(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   		return 1;
>   	if (eb && btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0)
>   		return 1;
> +
> +	tree_mod_log_write_lock(fs_info);
> +	if (list_empty(&(fs_info)->tree_mod_seq_list)) {
> +		tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static inline int
> -__tree_mod_log_insert_key(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> -			  struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
> -			  enum mod_log_op op, gfp_t flags)
> +/* Similar to tree_mod_dont_log, but doesn't acquire any locks. */
> +static inline int tree_mod_need_log(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> +				    struct extent_buffer *eb)
> +{
> +	smp_mb();
> +	if (list_empty(&(fs_info)->tree_mod_seq_list))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (eb && btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static struct tree_mod_elem *
> +alloc_tree_mod_elem(struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
> +		    enum mod_log_op op, gfp_t flags)
>   {
>   	struct tree_mod_elem *tm;
>   
>   	tm = kzalloc(sizeof(*tm), flags);
>   	if (!tm)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		return NULL;
>   
>   	tm->index = eb->start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>   	if (op != MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD) {
> @@ -567,7 +573,7 @@ __tree_mod_log_insert_key(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   	tm->slot = slot;
>   	tm->generation = btrfs_node_ptr_generation(eb, slot);
>   
> -	return __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm);
> +	return tm;
>   }
>   
>   static noinline int
> @@ -575,10 +581,25 @@ tree_mod_log_insert_key(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   			struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
>   			enum mod_log_op op, gfp_t flags)
>   {
> -	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, eb))
> +	struct tree_mod_elem *tm;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!tree_mod_need_log(fs_info, eb))
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	return __tree_mod_log_insert_key(fs_info, eb, slot, op, flags);
> +	tm = alloc_tree_mod_elem(eb, slot, op, flags);
> +	if (!tm)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, eb)) {
> +		kfree(tm);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm);
> +	tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static noinline int
> @@ -586,51 +607,76 @@ tree_mod_log_insert_move(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   			 struct extent_buffer *eb, int dst_slot, int src_slot,
>   			 int nr_items, gfp_t flags)
>   {
> -	struct tree_mod_elem *tm;
> -	int ret;
> +	struct tree_mod_elem *tm = NULL;
> +	struct tree_mod_elem **tm_list = NULL;
> +	int ret = 0;
>   	int i;
>   
> -	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, eb))
> +	if (!tree_mod_need_log(fs_info, eb))
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	tm = kzalloc(sizeof(*tm), flags);
> +	if (!tm)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	tm->index = eb->start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +	tm->slot = src_slot;
> +	tm->move.dst_slot = dst_slot;
> +	tm->move.nr_items = nr_items;
> +	tm->op = MOD_LOG_MOVE_KEYS;
> +
> +	tm_list = kzalloc(nr_items * sizeof(struct tree_mod_elem *), flags);
> +	if (!tm_list) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto free_tms;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i + dst_slot < src_slot && i < nr_items; i++) {
> +		tm_list[i] = alloc_tree_mod_elem(eb, i + dst_slot,
> +		    MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING, flags);
> +		if (!tm_list[i]) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto free_tms;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, eb))
> +		goto free_tms;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * When we override something during the move, we log these removals.
>   	 * This can only happen when we move towards the beginning of the
>   	 * buffer, i.e. dst_slot < src_slot.
>   	 */
>   	for (i = 0; i + dst_slot < src_slot && i < nr_items; i++) {
> -		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert_key(fs_info, eb, i + dst_slot,
> -				MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING, GFP_NOFS);
> +		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm_list[i]);
>   		BUG_ON(ret < 0);
>   	}
>   
> -	tm = kzalloc(sizeof(*tm), flags);
> -	if (!tm)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm);
> +	tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
> +	kfree(tm_list);
>   
> -	tm->index = eb->start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> -	tm->slot = src_slot;
> -	tm->move.dst_slot = dst_slot;
> -	tm->move.nr_items = nr_items;
> -	tm->op = MOD_LOG_MOVE_KEYS;
> +	return ret;
> +free_tms:
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_items; i++)
> +		kfree(tm_list[i]);
> +	kfree(tm_list);
> +	kfree(tm);
>   
> -	return __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm);
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static inline void
> -__tree_mod_log_free_eb(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *eb)
> +__tree_mod_log_free_eb(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> +		       struct tree_mod_elem **tm_list,
> +		       int nritems)
>   {
>   	int i;
> -	u32 nritems;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0)
> -		return;
> -
> -	nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(eb);
>   	for (i = nritems - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert_key(fs_info, eb, i,
> -				MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING, GFP_NOFS);
> +		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm_list[i]);
>   		BUG_ON(ret < 0);
>   	}
>   }
> @@ -641,17 +687,38 @@ tree_mod_log_insert_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   			 struct extent_buffer *new_root, gfp_t flags,
>   			 int log_removal)
>   {
> -	struct tree_mod_elem *tm;
> +	struct tree_mod_elem *tm = NULL;
> +	struct tree_mod_elem **tm_list = NULL;
> +	int nritems = 0;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int i;
>   
> -	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, NULL))
> +	if (!tree_mod_need_log(fs_info, NULL))
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	if (log_removal)
> -		__tree_mod_log_free_eb(fs_info, old_root);
> +	if (log_removal && btrfs_header_level(old_root) > 0) {
> +		nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(old_root);
> +		tm_list = kzalloc(nritems * sizeof(struct tree_mod_elem *),
> +				  flags);
> +		if (!tm_list) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto free_tms;
> +		}
> +		for (i = 0; i < nritems; i++) {
> +			tm_list[i] = alloc_tree_mod_elem(old_root, i,
> +			    MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING, flags);
> +			if (!tm_list[i]) {
> +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> +				goto free_tms;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
>   
>   	tm = kzalloc(sizeof(*tm), flags);
> -	if (!tm)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (!tm) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto free_tms;
> +	}
>   
>   	tm->index = new_root->start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>   	tm->old_root.logical = old_root->start;
> @@ -659,7 +726,27 @@ tree_mod_log_insert_root(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   	tm->generation = btrfs_header_generation(old_root);
>   	tm->op = MOD_LOG_ROOT_REPLACE;
>   
> -	return __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm);
> +	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, NULL))
> +		goto free_tms;
> +
> +	if (tm_list)
> +		__tree_mod_log_free_eb(fs_info, tm_list, nritems);
> +
> +	ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm);
> +	tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
> +	kfree(tm_list);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +
> +free_tms:
> +	if (tm_list) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < nritems; i++)
> +			kfree(tm_list[i]);
> +		kfree(tm_list);
> +	}
> +	kfree(tm);
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static struct tree_mod_elem *
> @@ -733,26 +820,51 @@ tree_mod_log_eb_copy(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *dst,
>   		     struct extent_buffer *src, unsigned long dst_offset,
>   		     unsigned long src_offset, int nr_items)
>   {
> +	struct tree_mod_elem **tm_list = NULL;
> +	struct tree_mod_elem **tm_list_add, **tm_list_rem;
>   	int ret;
>   	int i;
>   
> -	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, NULL))
> +	if (!tree_mod_need_log(fs_info, NULL))
>   		return;
>   
>   	if (btrfs_header_level(dst) == 0 && btrfs_header_level(src) == 0)
>   		return;
>   
> +	tm_list = kzalloc(nr_items * 2 * sizeof(struct tree_mod_elem *),
> +			  GFP_NOFS);
> +	BUG_ON(!tm_list);

This isn't ok, we need to return -ENOMEM here.
> +
> +	tm_list_add = tm_list;
> +	tm_list_rem = tm_list + nr_items;
>   	for (i = 0; i < nr_items; i++) {
> -		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert_key(fs_info, src,
> -						i + src_offset,
> -						MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE, GFP_NOFS);
> +		tm_list_rem[i] = alloc_tree_mod_elem(src, i + src_offset,
> +		    MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE, GFP_NOFS);
> +		BUG_ON(!tm_list_rem[i]);

And here.
> +
> +		tm_list_add[i] = alloc_tree_mod_elem(dst, i + dst_offset,
> +		    MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD, GFP_NOFS);
> +		BUG_ON(!tm_list_add[i]);

And here.
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, NULL))
> +		goto free_tms;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_items; i++) {
> +		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm_list_rem[i]);
>   		BUG_ON(ret < 0);
> -		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert_key(fs_info, dst,
> -						     i + dst_offset,
> -						     MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD,
> -						     GFP_NOFS);
> +		ret = __tree_mod_log_insert(fs_info, tm_list_add[i]);
>   		BUG_ON(ret < 0);
>   	}
> +
> +	tree_mod_log_write_unlock(fs_info);
> +	kfree(tm_list);
> +	return;
> +
> +free_tms:
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_items * 2; i++)
> +		kfree(tm_list[i]);
> +	kfree(tm_list);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void
> @@ -780,9 +892,39 @@ tree_mod_log_set_node_key(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   static noinline void
>   tree_mod_log_free_eb(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *eb)
>   {
> -	if (tree_mod_dont_log(fs_info, eb))
> +	struct tree_mod_elem **tm_list = NULL;
> +	int nritems = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (btrfs_header_level(eb) == 0)
>   		return;
> -	__tree_mod_log_free_eb(fs_info, eb);
> +
> +	if (!tree_mod_need_log(fs_info, NULL))
> +		return;
> +
> +	nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(eb);
> +	tm_list = kzalloc(nritems * sizeof(struct tree_mod_elem *),
> +			  GFP_NOFS);
> +	BUG_ON(!tm_list);

And here.
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nritems; i++) {
> +		tm_list[i] = alloc_tree_mod_elem(eb, i,
> +		    MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING, GFP_NOFS);
> +		BUG_ON(!tm_list[i]);

And here.  Thanks,

Josef

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-13 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-13 19:41 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix tree mod logging Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-12-13 20:06 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-12-13 20:10   ` Filipe David Manana
2013-12-13 20:49     ` Josef Bacik
2013-12-13 22:57 ` [PATCH v2] " Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-12-19  7:37   ` Ahmet Inan
2013-12-19 20:17     ` Filipe David Manana
2013-12-20 15:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-12-20 23:19   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-12-20 23:31     ` Filipe David Manana
2013-12-20 23:52       ` Holger Hoffstätte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52AB68DD.6070508@fb.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).