From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Btrfs: avoid building inode cache repeatly
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:04:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AEC221.70708@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387178735-30832-2-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
On mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:25:33 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> Inode cache is similar to free space cache and in fact shares the same
> code, however, we don't load inode cache unless we're about to allocate
> inode id, then there is a case where we only commit the transaction during
> other operations, such as snapshot creation, we now update fs roots' generation
> to the new transaction id, after that when we want to load the inode cache,
> we'll find that it's not valid thanks to the mismatch of generation, and we
> have to push btrfs-ino-cache thread to build inode cache from disk, and
> this operation is sometimes time-costing.
>
> So to fix the above, we load inode cache into memory during reading fs root.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
> v2: fix race issue pointed by Miao.
>
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 3 +++
> fs/btrfs/inode-map.c | 6 ++++++
> fs/btrfs/inode-map.h | 1 +
> fs/btrfs/root-tree.c | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 8072cfa..59af2aa 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,9 @@ again:
> }
> goto fail;
> }
> +
> + btrfs_start_ino_caching(root);
> +
> return root;
> fail:
> free_fs_root(root);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
> index ab485e5..f23b0df 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ static void start_caching(struct btrfs_root *root)
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(tsk)); /* -ENOMEM */
> }
>
> +void btrfs_start_ino_caching(struct btrfs_root *root)
> +{
> + if (root)
> + start_caching(root);
> +}
We are sure root is not NULL, so this check is unnecessary.
I dipped into the problem, I don't think loading inode cache during reading
fs root is a good way to fix this problem, because in some cases, we read
the fs/file root, but we don't want to allocate/free the inode id.
I think we can add a flag, which is used to mark if the fs/file root has inode
id cache. We can set the flag when we reading the fs/file root. If the flag is
set but we don't allocate/free the inode id from/to the inode id cache, we set
the generation in the space cache header to 0, which can avoid loading a invalid
inode cache, and then clear the flag. How about this idea?
Thanks
Miao
> +
> int btrfs_find_free_ino(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 *objectid)
> {
> if (!btrfs_test_opt(root, INODE_MAP_CACHE))
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.h b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.h
> index ddb347b..5acf943 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode-map.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode-map.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> void btrfs_init_free_ino_ctl(struct btrfs_root *root);
> void btrfs_unpin_free_ino(struct btrfs_root *root);
> void btrfs_return_ino(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 objectid);
> +void btrfs_start_ino_caching(struct btrfs_root *root);
> int btrfs_find_free_ino(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 *objectid);
> int btrfs_save_ino_cache(struct btrfs_root *root,
> struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
> index ec71ea4..d4b6cfc 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #include "transaction.h"
> #include "disk-io.h"
> #include "print-tree.h"
> +#include "inode-map.h"
>
> /*
> * Read a root item from the tree. In case we detect a root item smaller then
> @@ -316,6 +317,8 @@ int btrfs_find_orphan_roots(struct btrfs_root *tree_root)
>
> if (btrfs_root_refs(&root->root_item) == 0)
> btrfs_add_dead_root(root);
> + else
> + btrfs_start_ino_caching(root);
> }
>
> btrfs_free_path(path);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-16 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 7:25 [PATCH v2 0/3] Btrfs: inode cache fixes Liu Bo
2013-12-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Btrfs: avoid building inode cache repeatly Liu Bo
2013-12-16 9:04 ` Miao Xie [this message]
2013-12-16 10:26 ` Liu Bo
2013-12-16 10:54 ` Miao Xie
2013-12-16 15:09 ` Chris Mason
2013-12-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Btrfs: don't build inode cache for orphan root Liu Bo
2013-12-16 7:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Btrfs: fix EEXIST error when creating new file in subvolume/snapshot Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AEC221.70708@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).