From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.jrs-s.net ([173.230.137.22]:32834 "EHLO mail.jrs-s.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755416AbaAFTZT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:25:19 -0500 Message-ID: <52CB031C.7060403@jrs-s.net> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:25:16 -0500 From: Jim Salter MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Murphy , Chris Samuel CC: linux-btrfs Subject: Re: btrfs raid1 and btrfs raid10 arrays NOT REDUNDANT References: <52C73987.7000106@jrs-s.net> <52C87A41.9030701@jrs-s.net> <05C97109-682D-4A62-B074-4EDCF8E9CE1E@colorremedies.com> <1416119.lWHlh5idGF@quad> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: FWIW, Ubuntu (and I presume Debian) will work just fine with a single / on btrfs, single or multi disk. I currently have two machines booting to a btrfs-raid10 / with no separate /boot, one booting to a btrfs single disk / with no /boot, and one booting to a btrfs-raid10 / with an ext4-on-mdraid1 /boot. On 01/06/2014 01:30 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > Color me surprised. Fedora 20 lets you create Btrfs raid1/raid0 for > rootfs, but due to a long standing grubby bug [1] /boot can't be on > Btrfs, so it's only ext4.