From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: fix wrong send_in_progress accounting
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:12:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CB7090.2050205@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CB7016.707@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 01/07/2014 11:10 AM, Wang Shilong wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 01/07/2014 12:30 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 05:25:06PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
>>> Steps to reproduce:
>>>
>>> # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda8
>>> # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt
>>> # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
>>> # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
>>> # btrfs send /mnt/snap2 -p /mnt/snap1
>>>
>>> As @send_root will also add into clone_sources, and we should
>>> take care not to decrease its count twice.
>> Yes, send_root is appended to the clone_roots but the
>> clone_sources_to_rollback does not track this, it's not updated after
>> it's added in
>>
>> sctx->clone_roots[sctx->clone_roots_cnt++].root = sctx->send_root;
>>
>> so send->root->send_in_progress is not modified in the loop that
>> decrements all clone_root's counters again.
>>
>> I don't see the warning that should catch negative values of the counter
>> in btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress. Am I missing something?
> You are right here, but problem still exist.
>
> The problem is that we will sort clone sources before we decrease count,
> When sorting clone counts, we include send_root, and it will push to
> the first
> place.....and when we try to free send_root count, it will be
> decreased twice.
>
> Hope i am not wrong this time!
>
> Thanks Daivd to force me dig more!
My steps is a little problem, if you try this, you will find the warnig:
# btrfs sub snapshot . -r snap1
# btrfs sub snapshot . -r snap2
# btrfs send snap1 -p snap2 -f 1
# dmesg
>
>>
>>
>> david
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-06 9:25 [PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: fix wrong send_in_progress accounting Wang Shilong
2014-01-06 16:30 ` David Sterba
2014-01-07 1:27 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-07 3:10 ` Wang Shilong
2014-01-07 3:12 ` Wang Shilong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CB7090.2050205@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox