From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caibbdcaaagj.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.69]:34286 "EHLO homiemail-a56.g.dreamhost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753045AbaBJQvl (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:51:41 -0500 Message-ID: <52F903D9.7030309@navitsky.org> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:52:41 -0800 From: John Navitsky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: system stuck with flush-btrfs-4 at 100% after filesystem resize References: <52F67926.7060209@navitsky.org> <52F901AE.1080908@fb.com> In-Reply-To: <52F901AE.1080908@fb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2/10/2014 8:43 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On 02/08/2014 01:36 PM, John Navitsky wrote: >> romulus:/home/users/johnn # cat /etc/SuSE-release >> openSUSE 12.3 (x86_64) >> VERSION = 12.3 >> CODENAME = Dartmouth >> romulus:/home/users/johnn # uname -a >> Linux romulus.us.redacted.com 3.7.10-1.16-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri May >> 31 20:21:23 UTC 2013 (97c14ba) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> romulus:/home/users/johnn # > > Found your problem! Basically if you are going to run btrfs you should > at the very least keep up with the stable kernels. 3.11.whatever is > fine, 3.12.whatever is better. Thanks, > > Josef Thanks for the feedback. -john