From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>,
"lin >> \"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org\""
<linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What to do about df and btrfs fi df
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F94F5D.6000908@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210170606.GK6490@carfax.org.uk>
On 02/10/2014 06:06 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Biggest multiplier leads to the pessimistic estimate, which is what
> I'd prefer to see here, so that's good. Agree with this.
I would prefer to use as "raid multiplier" the ratio
total data block groups + total metadata block group
--------------------------------------------------------------
disk space allocated for data and metdata block group
I hope that this would work better when we have a filesystem composed
by small (inlined) files or when we will have per-subvolume RAID levels.
--
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 16:41 What to do about df and btrfs fi df Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 17:06 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-10 18:24 ` cwillu
2014-02-10 18:28 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 18:36 ` cwillu
2014-02-10 18:41 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-10 18:54 ` cwillu
2014-02-10 19:05 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-11 17:36 ` David Sterba
2014-02-17 17:08 ` David Sterba
2014-02-18 8:33 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-02-18 16:43 ` David Sterba
2014-02-11 1:02 ` Roger Binns
2014-02-11 3:13 ` cwillu
2014-02-11 3:35 ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-02-11 19:58 ` Roger Binns
2014-02-10 22:14 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2014-02-10 22:26 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-10 22:56 ` cwillu
2014-02-11 13:14 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-11 18:20 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-11 18:33 ` Josef Bacik
2014-02-11 18:46 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-11 18:56 ` Hugo Mills
2014-02-12 21:03 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-11 20:53 ` Sandy McArthur
2014-02-12 3:09 ` Kostia Khlebopros
2014-02-12 21:12 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2014-02-12 3:55 ` Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F94F5D.6000908@libero.it \
--to=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).