* [PATCH] btrfs: tree-check: reduce stack consumption in check_dir_item
@ 2018-01-10 14:28 David Sterba
2018-01-10 15:46 ` Josef Bacik
2018-01-11 1:14 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2018-01-10 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs; +Cc: wqu, David Sterba
I've noticed that the updated item checker stack consumption increased
dramatically in 542f5385e20cf97447 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add checker
for dir item")
tree-checker.c:check_leaf +552 (176 -> 728)
The array is 255 bytes long, dynamic allocation would slow down the
sanity checks so it's more reasonable to keep it on-stack. Moving the
variable to the scope of use reduces the stack usage again
tree-checker.c:check_leaf -264 (728 -> 464)
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 7c55e3ba5a6c..c3c8d48f6618 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static int check_dir_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
di = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
while (cur < item_size) {
- char namebuf[max(BTRFS_NAME_LEN, XATTR_NAME_MAX)];
u32 name_len;
u32 data_len;
u32 max_name_len;
@@ -342,6 +341,8 @@ static int check_dir_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
*/
if (key->type == BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY ||
key->type == BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY) {
+ char namebuf[max(BTRFS_NAME_LEN, XATTR_NAME_MAX)];
+
read_extent_buffer(leaf, namebuf,
(unsigned long)(di + 1), name_len);
name_hash = btrfs_name_hash(namebuf, name_len);
--
2.15.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: tree-check: reduce stack consumption in check_dir_item
2018-01-10 14:28 [PATCH] btrfs: tree-check: reduce stack consumption in check_dir_item David Sterba
@ 2018-01-10 15:46 ` Josef Bacik
2018-01-11 1:14 ` Qu Wenruo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Josef Bacik @ 2018-01-10 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Sterba; +Cc: linux-btrfs, wqu
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:28:51PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> I've noticed that the updated item checker stack consumption increased
> dramatically in 542f5385e20cf97447 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add checker
> for dir item")
>
> tree-checker.c:check_leaf +552 (176 -> 728)
>
> The array is 255 bytes long, dynamic allocation would slow down the
> sanity checks so it's more reasonable to keep it on-stack. Moving the
> variable to the scope of use reduces the stack usage again
>
> tree-checker.c:check_leaf -264 (728 -> 464)
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Thanks,
Josef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] btrfs: tree-check: reduce stack consumption in check_dir_item
2018-01-10 14:28 [PATCH] btrfs: tree-check: reduce stack consumption in check_dir_item David Sterba
2018-01-10 15:46 ` Josef Bacik
@ 2018-01-11 1:14 ` Qu Wenruo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2018-01-11 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Sterba, linux-btrfs; +Cc: wqu
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1631 bytes --]
On 2018年01月10日 22:28, David Sterba wrote:
> I've noticed that the updated item checker stack consumption increased
> dramatically in 542f5385e20cf97447 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add checker
> for dir item")
>
> tree-checker.c:check_leaf +552 (176 -> 728)
>
> The array is 255 bytes long, dynamic allocation would slow down the
> sanity checks so it's more reasonable to keep it on-stack. Moving the
> variable to the scope of use reduces the stack usage again
>
> tree-checker.c:check_leaf -264 (728 -> 464)
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> index 7c55e3ba5a6c..c3c8d48f6618 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static int check_dir_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
>
> di = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_dir_item);
> while (cur < item_size) {
> - char namebuf[max(BTRFS_NAME_LEN, XATTR_NAME_MAX)];
> u32 name_len;
> u32 data_len;
> u32 max_name_len;
> @@ -342,6 +341,8 @@ static int check_dir_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
> */
> if (key->type == BTRFS_DIR_ITEM_KEY ||
> key->type == BTRFS_XATTR_ITEM_KEY) {
> + char namebuf[max(BTRFS_NAME_LEN, XATTR_NAME_MAX)];
> +
> read_extent_buffer(leaf, namebuf,
> (unsigned long)(di + 1), name_len);
> name_hash = btrfs_name_hash(namebuf, name_len);
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-11 1:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-10 14:28 [PATCH] btrfs: tree-check: reduce stack consumption in check_dir_item David Sterba
2018-01-10 15:46 ` Josef Bacik
2018-01-11 1:14 ` Qu Wenruo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).