* know mount location with in FS
@ 2014-02-16 15:02 Anand Jain
2014-02-17 17:22 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-02-16 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: btrfs
Hello,
I wonder if there is any known way to get the mount point directory name
with in the btrfs-kernel ?
Thanks, Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: know mount location with in FS
2014-02-16 15:02 know mount location with in FS Anand Jain
@ 2014-02-17 17:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-18 3:06 ` Anand Jain
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-02-17 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain, btrfs
On 2/16/14, 9:02 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if there is any known way to get the mount point directory name with in the btrfs-kernel ?
For what reason?
Remember that a single block device can be mounted in multiple places (or bind-mounted, etc), so there is not even necessarily a single answer to that question.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: know mount location with in FS
2014-02-17 17:22 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-02-18 3:06 ` Anand Jain
2014-02-18 8:40 ` Goswin von Brederlow
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anand Jain @ 2014-02-18 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen, btrfs
> For what reason?
>
> Remember that a single block device can be mounted in multiple places
> (or bind-mounted, etc), so there is not even necessarily a single
> answer to that question.
>
> -Eric
Yes indeed. (the attempt is should we be able to maintain all
the mount points as a list saved/updated under per fs_devices. ?)
some of the exported symbols at fs/namei.c looks closely
related to the purpose here, but it didn't help unless
I missed something.
any comment is helpful..
The reason:
First of all btrfs-progs has used "scan-all-disks" very
liberally which isn't a scalable design (imagine a data
center with 1000's of LUN).
Even a simple check_mounted() does scan-all-disks (when
total_disk >1), that isn't necessary if the kernel could
let it know.
Scan for btrfs has expensive steps of reading each super-block,
and the effect is, in general most of the btrfs-progs commands
are very very slow when things like scrub is running.
check_mounted() fails when seeding is used (since
/proc/self/mounts would show disk with lowest devid and in
most common scenario it will be a seed disk. (which has
different FSID from the actual disk in question). and
Further most severe problem is some btrfs-progs threads has been
scan-all-disks more than once during the thread's life time.
So a total revamp of this design has become an immediate need.
What I am planning is
- btrfs-progs to init btrfs-disk-list once per required thread
(mostly use BTRFS_IOC_GET_DEVS, which would dump anything
and everything about the btrfs devices)
- the btrfs-disk-list is obtained from kernel first, and will
fill with the remaining disks which kernel isn't aware of.
- If the step one also provides the mount point(s) from the
kernel that would complete the loop with what end user
would want to know.
Thanks, Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: know mount location with in FS
2014-02-18 3:06 ` Anand Jain
@ 2014-02-18 8:40 ` Goswin von Brederlow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Goswin von Brederlow @ 2014-02-18 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Jain; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, btrfs
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:06:38AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
> >For what reason?
> >
> >Remember that a single block device can be mounted in multiple places
> > (or bind-mounted, etc), so there is not even necessarily a single
> > answer to that question.
> >
> >-Eric
>
> Yes indeed. (the attempt is should we be able to maintain all
> the mount points as a list saved/updated under per fs_devices. ?)
>
> some of the exported symbols at fs/namei.c looks closely
> related to the purpose here, but it didn't help unless
> I missed something.
>
> any comment is helpful..
>
> The reason:
> First of all btrfs-progs has used "scan-all-disks" very
> liberally which isn't a scalable design (imagine a data
> center with 1000's of LUN).
> Even a simple check_mounted() does scan-all-disks (when
> total_disk >1), that isn't necessary if the kernel could
> let it know.
> Scan for btrfs has expensive steps of reading each super-block,
> and the effect is, in general most of the btrfs-progs commands
> are very very slow when things like scrub is running.
> check_mounted() fails when seeding is used (since
> /proc/self/mounts would show disk with lowest devid and in
> most common scenario it will be a seed disk. (which has
> different FSID from the actual disk in question). and
> Further most severe problem is some btrfs-progs threads has been
> scan-all-disks more than once during the thread's life time.
> So a total revamp of this design has become an immediate need.
>
> What I am planning is
> - btrfs-progs to init btrfs-disk-list once per required thread
> (mostly use BTRFS_IOC_GET_DEVS, which would dump anything
> and everything about the btrfs devices)
> - the btrfs-disk-list is obtained from kernel first, and will
> fill with the remaining disks which kernel isn't aware of.
> - If the step one also provides the mount point(s) from the
> kernel that would complete the loop with what end user
> would want to know.
>
>
> Thanks, Anand
What about mountpoints outside the current filesystem namespace or
ones that should be shortened to the filesystem namespace (e.g. in a
chroot the leading dirs need to be cut)?
MfG
Goswin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-18 8:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-16 15:02 know mount location with in FS Anand Jain
2014-02-17 17:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-18 3:06 ` Anand Jain
2014-02-18 8:40 ` Goswin von Brederlow
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).