On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:39:03 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:19:50AM +0000, quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
>> @@ -23,11 +23,13 @@
>>   struct btrfs_workqueue;
>>   /* Internal use only */
>>   struct __btrfs_workqueue;
>> +struct btrfs_work;
>> +typedef void (*btrfs_func_t)(struct btrfs_work *arg);
> I don't see what's wrong with the non-typedef type, CodingStyle
> discourages from using typedefs in general (Chapter 5).
>
> The name btrfs_func_t is a generic, if you really need to use a typedef
> here, please change it to something closer to the workqueues, eg.
> btrfs_work_func_t.
>
btrfs_func_t is just following the work_func_t naming style,
for btrfs it's only used to reduce the length of prototype definition.

Since btrfs_func_t is only used in btrfs, this patch can be ignored.

Thanks
Qu���{.n�+�������+%�����ݶ��w��{.n�+����{���k~���^n�r���z���h����&���z��z�ޗ�+��+zf���h���~����i��������z_��j:+v���)ߣ�m