From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:58426 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754671AbaDHB1O convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:27:14 -0400 Message-ID: <534350AA.8030209@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:28:10 +0800 From: Qu Wenruo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Trofimovich CC: Sergei Trofimovich , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix crash in remount(thread_pool=) case References: <1396857346-24877-1-git-send-email-slyich@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1396857346-24877-1-git-send-email-slyich@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 于 2014年04月07日 15:55, Sergei Trofimovich 写道: > From: Sergei Trofimovich > > Reproducer: > mount /dev/ubda /mnt > mount -oremount,thread_pool=42 /mnt > > Gives a crash: > ? btrfs_workqueue_set_max+0x0/0x70 > btrfs_resize_thread_pool+0xe3/0xf0 > ? sync_filesystem+0x0/0xc0 > ? btrfs_resize_thread_pool+0x0/0xf0 > btrfs_remount+0x1d2/0x570 > ? kern_path+0x0/0x80 > do_remount_sb+0xd9/0x1c0 > do_mount+0x26a/0xbf0 > ? kfree+0x0/0x1b0 > SyS_mount+0xc4/0x110 > > It's a call > btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers, new_pool_size); > with > fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers = NULL; > > as scrub wqs get created only on user's demand. > > Patch skips not-created-yet workqueues. > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich > CC: Qu Wenruo > CC: Chris Mason > CC: Josef Bacik > CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > > --- > fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > index ecb5832..5a201d8 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c > @@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ void btrfs_destroy_workqueue(struct btrfs_workqueue *wq) > > void btrfs_workqueue_set_max(struct btrfs_workqueue *wq, int max) > { > + if (!wq) > + return; > wq->normal->max_active = max; > if (wq->high) > wq->high->max_active = max; Oh, that's my fault. You got me. Thanks for the patch. Qu.