From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix the return value of btrfs_scan_kernel()
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:18:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5344ADD8.5070301@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5344ABEB.20906@oracle.com>
Nope, the fix can also deal with no search parameter.
If any btrfs filesystem can be found and printed, found will be set to 1
which considered as found,
then 0 will be returned.
Thanks,
Qu
于 2014年04月09日 10:09, Anand Jain 写道:
>
> I expect btrfs_scan_kernel() would go away in the long run,
> however below fix has a problem - when there is no search item
> you would return fail (1) always. Since btrfs_scan_kernel() has
> limited usage as you mention as well. So I will leave it to David
> to decide.
>
> Thanks, Anand
>
> On 08/04/2014 17:16, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> btrfs_scan_kernel() is only used in 'btrfs fi show' but returns wrong
>> return value.
>> When search parameter is passed, it will never return 0 even the search
>> can be matched.
>>
>> This patch will change the whatever strange logic to a more easy to
>> understand one using 'found' var.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> cmds-filesystem.c | 9 +++------
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cmds-filesystem.c b/cmds-filesystem.c
>> index b81768b..49d3aa7 100644
>> --- a/cmds-filesystem.c
>> +++ b/cmds-filesystem.c
>> @@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ static int btrfs_scan_kernel_v2(void *search)
>> static int btrfs_scan_kernel(void *search)
>> {
>> int ret = 0, fd;
>> + int found = 0;
>> FILE *f;
>> struct mntent *mnt;
>> struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args fs_info_arg;
>> @@ -452,7 +453,6 @@ static int btrfs_scan_kernel(void *search)
>>
>> if (get_label_mounted(mnt->mnt_dir, label)) {
>> kfree(dev_info_arg);
>> - ret = 1;
>> goto out;
>> }
>> if (search && !match_search_item_kernel(fs_info_arg.fsid,
>> @@ -467,19 +467,16 @@ static int btrfs_scan_kernel(void *search)
>> space_info_arg, label, mnt->mnt_dir);
>> kfree(space_info_arg);
>> memset(label, 0, sizeof(label));
>> + found = 1;
>> }
>> if (fd != -1)
>> close(fd);
>> kfree(dev_info_arg);
>> - if (search)
>> - ret = 0;
>> }
>> - if (search)
>> - ret = 1;
>>
>> out:
>> endmntent(f);
>> - return ret;
>> + return !found;
>> }
>>
>> static int dev_to_fsid(char *dev, __u8 *fsid)
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-08 9:16 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Fix the return value of btrfs_scan_kernel() Qu Wenruo
2014-04-09 2:09 ` Anand Jain
2014-04-09 2:18 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2014-04-09 3:19 ` Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5344ADD8.5070301@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).