From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from noc.netops.me ([50.22.23.10]:57187 "EHLO noc.netops.me" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750860AbaDXHN1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:13:27 -0400 Message-ID: <5358B996.4060102@aeb.io> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:13:26 -0700 From: Adam Brenner MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc MERLIN , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which companies are using Btrfs in production? References: <20140424011834.GN26949@merlins.org> <20140424011952.GO26949@merlins.org> In-Reply-To: <20140424011952.GO26949@merlins.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/23/2014 06:19 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote: > Oh while we're at it, are there companies that can say they are using btrfs > in production? > > Marc > On the Gluster Listsrv a few brave souls have used it on as a distributive filesystem[1]. Here at UCI's HPC Cluster we *might* use it on a scratch filesystem ... if we upgrade to a newer kernel.... [1]: http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-April/039896.html -- Adam Brenner