linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: <russell@coker.com.au>, Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Balance performance problem with 3.14.1
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:10:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <536BAC5F.60803@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201405081950.23922.russell@coker.com.au>

On 05/08/2014 05:50 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've got a server/workstation (KDE desktop and file server) running kernel
> 3.14.1 from the Debian package 3.14-trunk-amd64.
>
> It was running well until I decided to do a full balance of the BTRFS RAID-1
> array of 3TB SATA disks (which hadn't been balanced before due to previous
> kernels performing badly with scrub or balance).  I canceled the balance after
> about 5 days when it had been claiming to be about 65% done for a day while
> doing a lot of disk IO.
>

Can I see dmesg/messages for the time that this was running for so long?

> After canceling the balance the performance of the array has been poor.  It
> has a cron job that runs twice a week to rsync data from a Maildir based mail
> server that currently has 2401473 Inodes in use according to ZFS on the mail
> server (unfortunately BTRFS won't tell me how many Inodes are in use).  The
> cron job does an "rsync -va" type backup WITHOUT the -c option, so we're
> basically doing a recursive stat on all files and then transferring new files
> (Dovecot index files are excluded so files tend never to change).  After the
> rsync is complete "cp -rl" is used to make a backup of the tree.
>
> The cp -rl usually takes something less than 30 minutes (not long enough for
> me to even notice) but today cp has been running for 5.5 hours and seems to be
> about 3/5 done (9000/15000 subdirectories linked).
>

Sysrq+w while it's running, just one and then wait a while and then 
another.  Thanks,

Josef

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-05-08 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-08  9:50 Balance performance problem with 3.14.1 Russell Coker
2014-05-08 15:07 ` Duncan
2014-05-08 16:10 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2014-05-12  2:17   ` Russell Coker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-05-08 11:47 Tomasz Chmielewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=536BAC5F.60803@fb.com \
    --to=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=russell@coker.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).