From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
To: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool V2
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:45:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536D3E51.80209@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140508233414.GC12210@lenny.home.zabbo.net>
On 05/08/2014 07:34 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_REF_VERIFY
>> +int btrfs_build_ref_tree(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
>> +void btrfs_free_ref_cache(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);
>> +int btrfs_ref_tree_mod(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 bytenr, u64 num_bytes,
>> + u64 parent, u64 ref_root, u64 owner, u64 offset,
>> + int action);
>> +void btrfs_free_ref_tree_range(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start,
>> + u64 len);
>> +#else
>> +
>> +#define btrfs_free_ref_cache(fs_info) do { } while (0)
>> +#define btrfs_ref_tree_mod(root, bytenr, num_bytes, parent, ref_root, \
>> + owner, offset, action) do { } while (0)
>> +#define btrfs_free_ref_tree_range(fs_info, start, len) do { } while (0)
>> +
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_REF_VERIFY */
>> +#endif /* _REF_VERIFY__ */
>
> Don't just omit the arguments when the config isn't enabled. That can
> let these calls bit rot over time as everyone build tests their changes
> with the config disabled, as they will.
>
> int derp;
>
> ...
>
> btrfs_free_ref_cache(derp);
>
> ...
>
> - derp++;
>
>
> Will have gcc warn that derp is unused. They'll delete it and send out
> the patch. You'll later turn on the config and get undefined derp
> warnings.
>
> inline stubs are the best way out. They'll still warn if the arg is
> used undefined. Putting (void)arg; in the macros doesn't warn in that
> case.
Gcc doesn't complain when I build with it off but I can switch to inline
stubs if that makes you feel better. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-08 20:55 [PATCH] Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool V2 Josef Bacik
2014-05-08 23:34 ` Zach Brown
2014-05-09 20:45 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2014-05-09 20:53 ` Zach Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-28 20:20 Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536D3E51.80209@fb.com \
--to=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox