From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Add ctime/mtime update for btrfs device add/remove.
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:43:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538844C8.6060800@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53883883.8020608@oracle.com>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Add ctime/mtime update for btrfs device
add/remove.
From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Date: 2014年05月30日 15:51
>
>
>
>
> Hi Qu,
>
> In line below...
>
> On 16/04/14 17:02, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Btrfs will send uevent to udev inform the device change,
>> but ctime/mtime for the block device inode is not udpated, which cause
>> libblkid used by btrfs-progs unable to detect device change and use old
>> cache, causing 'btrfs dev scan; btrfs dev rmove; btrfs dev scan' give an
>> error message.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index 49d7fab..ce232d7 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -1452,6 +1452,22 @@ out:
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Function to update ctime/mtime for a given device path.
>> + * Mainly used for ctime/mtime based probe like libblkid.
>> + */
>> +static void update_dev_time(char *path_name)
>> +{
>> + struct file *filp;
>> +
>> + filp = filp_open(path_name, O_RDWR, 0);
>> + if (!filp)
>> + return;
>> + file_update_time(filp);
>> + filp_close(filp, NULL);
>> + return;
>> +}
>> +
>
> IMO /(I might be wrong) I think its not a good idea to explicitly
> achieve this. Since this thread would have already scratched the
> device's SB, shouldn't that take care of updating the mtime ?
>
> Thanks, Anand
Yes, scratching SB will update the time of the device's inode.
But the problem is that, the *block file*'s ctime/mtime is not changed
according to the device's inode mtime/ctime.
So in the patch, I use the device's *full path* not the *device's inode*
to update ctime/mtime since kernel operations
will not update ctime/mtine of *device files under /dev*.
About your fix patch ([PATCH] btrfs: kobject_uevent should use bd_part
instead of bd_disk )
I am unable to reproduce the problem on 3.15-rc4 kernel with 3.14.1
btrfs-progs. :(
But the ctime/mtime things will not change as the following example:
------
# btrfs dev scan;stat /dev/sdd ; btrfs dev del /dev/sdd
/mnt/scratch/;stat /dev/sdd ; btrfs dev scan
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems
File: '/dev/sdd'
Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 block special
file
Device: 5h/5d Inode: 8569 Links: 1 Device type: 8,30
Access: (0660/brw-rw----) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 6/ disk)
Access: 2014-05-30 16:39:06.104006687 +0800
Modify: 2014-05-30 16:38:57.638006272 +0800 <<<ctime/mtime does not change
Change: 2014-05-30 16:38:57.638006272 +0800
Birth: -
File: '/dev/sdd'
Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 block special
file
Device: 5h/5d Inode: 8569 Links: 1 Device type: 8,30
Access: (0660/brw-rw----) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 6/ disk)
Access: 2014-05-30 16:39:06.104006687 +0800
Modify: 2014-05-30 16:38:57.638006272 +0800 <<<ctime/mtime does not change
Change: 2014-05-30 16:38:57.638006272 +0800
Birth: -
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems
^^^ But no error message now.... :(
------
Thanks,
Qu
>
>
>> static int btrfs_rm_dev_item(struct btrfs_root *root,
>> struct btrfs_device *device)
>> {
>> @@ -1704,10 +1720,14 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root,
>> char *device_path)
>>
>> ret = 0;
>>
>> - /* Notify udev that device has changed */
>> - if (bdev)
>> + if (bdev) {
>> + /* Notify udev that device has changed */
>> btrfs_kobject_uevent(bdev, KOBJ_CHANGE);
>>
>> + /* Update ctime/mtime for device path for libblkid */
>> + update_dev_time(device_path);
>> + }
>> +
>
>
>
>> error_brelse:
>> brelse(bh);
>> if (bdev)
>> @@ -2146,6 +2166,8 @@ int btrfs_init_new_device(struct btrfs_root
>> *root, char *device_path)
>> ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
>> }
>>
>> + /* Update ctime/mtime for libblkid */
>> + update_dev_time(device_path);
>> return ret;
>>
>> error_trans:
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-16 9:02 [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Add ctime/mtime update for btrfs device add/remove Qu Wenruo
2014-05-29 12:43 ` David Sterba
2014-05-30 1:27 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-06-04 5:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2014-05-30 7:51 ` Anand Jain
2014-05-30 7:53 ` Anand Jain
2014-05-30 8:43 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538844C8.6060800@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Anand.Jain@oracle.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).